Wishocracy: Solving the Democratic Principal-Agent Problem Through Pairwise Preference Aggregation
Politicians' votes have near-zero correlation with citizen preferences (Gilens and Page, 2014). Elite preferences predict policy outcomes. No mechanism connects citizen preferences to electoral consequences for representatives. RAPPA: Millions of citizens answer simple pairwise questions ("How would you split $100 between these two budget categories?"). Geometric mean aggregation produces population-level preference weights from sparse individual responses. Unlike approval voting or ranked choice, RAPPA captures preference *intensity*, not just what people want, but how much they care. Compare aggregated preferences to each legislator's voting record. Publish Citizen Alignment Scores. Channel campaign resources to high-alignment candidates through Incentive Alignment Bonds. The mechanism achieves three properties no prior system combines: minimal cognitive load (~20 comparisons per participant yields statistical convergence), preference intensity capture, and approximate strategy-proofness.
Authors
- Mike P. Sinn
Institutions
- Accelerated Medical Diagnostics (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-02-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18205882
- Primary Topic
- Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00