Auditor Industry Focus and Audit Fees

SUMMARY The audit pricing literature documents industry-specific pricing effects, focusing on the largest auditors with inter-firm (across firms) advantages developed through market dominance. However, prior studies have distinguished between auditors’ inter-firm and intra-firm (within-firm) advantages within an industry. We examine how auditors’ relative industry focus serves as an intra-firm advantage, distinct from market share and other portfolio measures. To capture this, we use FOCUS, a measure of auditors’ relative production efficiencies within an industry. Using 20,530 observations of U.S.-listed firms from 2009 to 2019, we find consistent evidence that relative industry focus is associated with lower audit fees. This effect is distinct from auditor size and scale measures, robust to alternative specifications, and is not associated with lower audit quality. These findings demonstrate that auditors of all sizes can develop industry-specific comparative advantages, addressing the limited research on smaller auditors’ industry-specific competencies. Data Availability: Data used in this study are available from public sources identified in the paper. JEL Classifications: M40; M4; L11.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2022-064
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auditor Industry Focus and Audit Fees

Xikai Chen, Tom Scott, Matthew Grosse, Nelson Ma
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Auditor Industry Focus and Audit Fees

Xikai Chen, Tom Scott, Matthew Grosse, Nelson Ma
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY The audit pricing literature documents industry-specific pricing effects, focusing on the largest auditors with inter-firm (across firms) advantages developed through market dominance. However, prior studies have distinguished between auditors’ inter-firm and intra-firm (within-firm) advantages within an industry. We examine how auditors’ relative industry focus serves as an intra-firm advantage, distinct from market share and other portfolio measures. To capture this, we use FOCUS, a measure of auditors’ relative production efficiencies within an industry. Using 20,530 observations of U.S.-listed firms from 2009 to 2019, we find consistent evidence that relative industry focus is associated with lower audit fees. This effect is distinct from auditor size and scale measures, robust to alternative specifications, and is not associated with lower audit quality. These findings demonstrate that auditors of all sizes can develop industry-specific comparative advantages, addressing the limited research on smaller auditors’ industry-specific competencies. Data Availability: Data used in this study are available from public sources identified in the paper. JEL Classifications: M40; M4; L11.

Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
University of Technology Sydney (AU), University of Auckland (NZ), California State University, Fresno (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Auditor Industry Focus and Audit Fees — Xikai Chen, Tom Scott, et al. · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS