Early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: From primary care screening to invasive hemodynamic confirmation

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is one of the most common forms of heart failure, and its prevalence is rising. As disease-modifying therapies become available, the accurate identification of early-stage HFpEF has become a major clinical priority. However, many patients with HFpEF are often managed for comorbidities such as hypertension, obesity, or diabetes, without recognizing the presence of HFpEF and targeted heart failure evaluation. In primary care, clinicians should keep HFpEF on the differential diagnosis for patients with unexplained exertional dyspnea, especially in older adults and in those with comorbidities such as obesity and atrial fibrillation. Simple clinical scores have been developed for this setting, including the HFpEF-ABA and BREATH<sub>2</sub> scores. These scoring systems can help clinicians estimate pre-test probabilities, enabling them to identify patients who should be referred to secondary or tertiary specialist centers. Close collaboration between primary care and secondary or tertiary centers is essential for timely diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. In secondary and tertiary care settings, more detailed multimodality scores, such as H<sub>2</sub>FPEF and HFA-PEFF which utilize natriuretic peptide levels and comprehensive echocardiography, are useful to rule in HFpEF. However, these scores have limited sensitivity to rule out HFpEF, particularly in obese patients, in whom natriuretic peptides and diastolic indices may underestimate the severity of left ventricular filling pressure. Patients with an intermediate probability should be evaluated by exercise stress echocardiography, but a substantial proportion of patients with negative or indeterminate test results still meets invasive hemodynamic criteria for HFpEF. This review summarizes current diagnostic strategies for suspected HFpEF and proposes a practical framework that combines validated noninvasive tools with selective use of invasive hemodynamic exercise testing and careful longitudinal follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2026.01.014
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
60.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: From primary care screening to invasive hemodynamic confirmation

Kazuki Kagami, Tomonari Harada, Hideki Ishii, Masaru Obokata
2 citations
Journal of Cardiology
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
60.13
article

Early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: From primary care screening to invasive hemodynamic confirmation

Kazuki Kagami, Tomonari Harada, Hideki Ishii, Masaru Obokata
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is one of the most common forms of heart failure, and its prevalence is rising. As disease-modifying therapies become available, the accurate identification of early-stage HFpEF has become a major clinical priority. However, many patients with HFpEF are often managed for comorbidities such as hypertension, obesity, or diabetes, without recognizing the presence of HFpEF and targeted heart failure evaluation. In primary care, clinicians should keep HFpEF on the differential diagnosis for patients with unexplained exertional dyspnea, especially in older adults and in those with comorbidities such as obesity and atrial fibrillation. Simple clinical scores have been developed for this setting, including the HFpEF-ABA and BREATH<sub>2</sub> scores. These scoring systems can help clinicians estimate pre-test probabilities, enabling them to identify patients who should be referred to secondary or tertiary specialist centers. Close collaboration between primary care and secondary or tertiary centers is essential for timely diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. In secondary and tertiary care settings, more detailed multimodality scores, such as H<sub>2</sub>FPEF and HFA-PEFF which utilize natriuretic peptide levels and comprehensive echocardiography, are useful to rule in HFpEF. However, these scores have limited sensitivity to rule out HFpEF, particularly in obese patients, in whom natriuretic peptides and diastolic indices may underestimate the severity of left ventricular filling pressure. Patients with an intermediate probability should be evaluated by exercise stress echocardiography, but a substantial proportion of patients with negative or indeterminate test results still meets invasive hemodynamic criteria for HFpEF. This review summarizes current diagnostic strategies for suspected HFpEF and proposes a practical framework that combines validated noninvasive tools with selective use of invasive hemodynamic exercise testing and careful longitudinal follow-up.

Journal of Cardiology
Gunma University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
60.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.