Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of Ultrasound, Mammography, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosing Breast Cancer Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes: A Single-Center Experience

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Axillary lymph node (ALN) status is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast cancer. Numerous studies have evaluated less invasive methods for accurate staging. To investigate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US), mammography, and <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT) in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Axillary involvement detected by US, mammography, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT was analyzed in patients who underwent axillary dissection. Preoperatively, 365, 318, and 85 of 557 patients were evaluated with US, mammography, and PET/CT, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of each imaging modality were calculated. <i>Results</i>: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of US were 33.3%, 97.5%, 94.4%, 51.0%, and 57.8%, respectively. False-negative US findings were more frequent in T1 (84.6%) and N1 (76.3%) tumors (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for both). For mammography, these values were 12.9%, 97.74%, 88.89%, 44.67%, and 52.9%, while for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT they were 72.5%, 100%, 100%, 67.65%, and 82.5%, respectively. <i>Conclusions</i>: Ultrasound remains useful for evaluating axillary lymph node involvement in advanced breast cancer but is insufficient for early-stage disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62020320
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of Ultrasound, Mammography, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosing Breast Cancer Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes: A Single-Center Experience

Mehmet Kalender, Talha Yıldız, Gökmen Aktaş, Hakan Büyükhatipoğlu et al.
Medicina
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of Ultrasound, Mammography, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosing Breast Cancer Metastasis to Axillary Lymph Nodes: A Single-Center Experience

Mehmet Kalender, Talha Yıldız, Gökmen Aktaş, Hakan Büyükhatipoğlu, Alper Sevinç, C. Camcı, Hamit Yıldız, Seval Kul, Tulay Kus
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Axillary lymph node (ALN) status is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast cancer. Numerous studies have evaluated less invasive methods for accurate staging. To investigate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US), mammography, and <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT) in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Axillary involvement detected by US, mammography, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT was analyzed in patients who underwent axillary dissection. Preoperatively, 365, 318, and 85 of 557 patients were evaluated with US, mammography, and PET/CT, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of each imaging modality were calculated. <i>Results</i>: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of US were 33.3%, 97.5%, 94.4%, 51.0%, and 57.8%, respectively. False-negative US findings were more frequent in T1 (84.6%) and N1 (76.3%) tumors (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for both). For mammography, these values were 12.9%, 97.74%, 88.89%, 44.67%, and 52.9%, while for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT they were 72.5%, 100%, 100%, 67.65%, and 82.5%, respectively. <i>Conclusions</i>: Ultrasound remains useful for evaluating axillary lymph node involvement in advanced breast cancer but is insufficient for early-stage disease.

MedicinaVol. 62(2)
Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital (TR), Istanbul Eye Hospital (TR), Gaziantep University (TR)
Gaziantep Üniversitesi
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.