Validity of a New Administrative Measure of Psychiatric Severity in a Prospective Sample of Veterans Applying for PTSD Disability Benefits: The Manifestations of Psychiatric Severity Index (MoPSI)

Background: Administrative data help managers monitor and manage health care enrollees’ health. Of the few available administrative measures of psychiatric illness severity, however, most either commingle sociodemographics and medical comorbidities or lack ordinal properties. Objective: To assess construct, concurrent, and predictive validity of a novel, 6-item, administrative measure of psychiatric severity, the Manifestations of Psychiatric Severity Index (MoPSI). Methods: A panel study of 960 gender-stratified, nationally representative, post-9/11 US Veterans with pending disability claims for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). MoPSI scoring was based on the joint probability density (JPD) method and a JPD linear approximation. Results: The JPD MoPSI score and its linear approximated score had a correlation of 0.999. Relative to their counterparts, unmarried Veterans, Veterans with low income, and Veterans with serious mental illness or PTSD had higher MoPSI scores (Ps: <0.0001–0.03). Higher MoPSI scores predicted cigarette and street drug use and PTSD and depression/anxiety symptoms six months later, and disability award approximately 1 year later (Ps: 0.01–0.02). Conclusions: In this sample, the MoPSI had evidence of construct, concurrent, and predictive validity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychiatry International
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint7010034
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of a New Administrative Measure of Psychiatric Severity in a Prospective Sample of Veterans Applying for PTSD Disability Benefits: The Manifestations of Psychiatric Severity Index (MoPSI)

Siamak Noorbaloochi, Barbara Clothier, Maureen Murdoch
Psychiatry International
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
article

Validity of a New Administrative Measure of Psychiatric Severity in a Prospective Sample of Veterans Applying for PTSD Disability Benefits: The Manifestations of Psychiatric Severity Index (MoPSI)

Siamak Noorbaloochi, Barbara Clothier, Maureen Murdoch
article en

Abstract

Background: Administrative data help managers monitor and manage health care enrollees’ health. Of the few available administrative measures of psychiatric illness severity, however, most either commingle sociodemographics and medical comorbidities or lack ordinal properties. Objective: To assess construct, concurrent, and predictive validity of a novel, 6-item, administrative measure of psychiatric severity, the Manifestations of Psychiatric Severity Index (MoPSI). Methods: A panel study of 960 gender-stratified, nationally representative, post-9/11 US Veterans with pending disability claims for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). MoPSI scoring was based on the joint probability density (JPD) method and a JPD linear approximation. Results: The JPD MoPSI score and its linear approximated score had a correlation of 0.999. Relative to their counterparts, unmarried Veterans, Veterans with low income, and Veterans with serious mental illness or PTSD had higher MoPSI scores (Ps: <0.0001–0.03). Higher MoPSI scores predicted cigarette and street drug use and PTSD and depression/anxiety symptoms six months later, and disability award approximately 1 year later (Ps: 0.01–0.02). Conclusions: In this sample, the MoPSI had evidence of construct, concurrent, and predictive validity.

Psychiatry InternationalVol. 7(1)
Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.