Next-generation nuclear waste management: Geological repositories, emerging technologies, and global pathways

• Global nuclear waste exceeds 370,000 tons, projected to 400,000 tons by 2035 • Geological repositories analyzed: Onkalo (5,500 t) and WIPP (175,000 m³) • Emerging solutions: borehole disposal, transmutation, vitrification, Synroc • Risk models show <1% failure probability with IAEA and EPA compliance • Future innovations: graphene barriers, robotics, and AI-enabled monitoring • Integrated strategies support safe, adaptive, and net-zero aligned disposal The safe management of nuclear waste remains a central challenge for sustaining nuclear energy in the low-carbon transition, with a global inventory exceeding 370,000 metric tons and increasing by 10,000 tons annually. This review synthesizes advances in waste classification, repository design, emerging disposal technologies, environmental safeguards, and future directions. Nuclear waste is categorized into low-level (90% volume, <1% radioactivity), intermediate-level (7% volume, 4% radioactivity), and high-level wastes (2% volume, >95% radioactivity), alongside highly radioactive spent fuel (10¹⁰–10¹⁴ Bq/g). Current strategies emphasize geological repositories such as Onkalo (5,500 tons, 400–500 m depth) and WIPP (175,000 m³, 655 m depth), which employ multi-barrier systems but face challenges including high heat output (10–20 kW/ton) and material durability (10⁻⁵/year corrosion). Complementary approaches deep borehole disposal (3–5 km depth, 1–2 billion USD), partitioning and transmutation (>90% toxicity reduction), and immobilization via vitrification (leach rate ∼10⁻⁶ g/m²/day) are advancing the safety and sustainability of disposal. Risk assessments, supported by IAEA safety standards, demonstrate <1% failure probability over 10,000 years, while future innovations in advanced materials (e.g., graphene by 2030), robotics (RADBOT deployment by 2028), and AI-driven monitoring (20% predictive improvement by 2035) could reduce long-term risks by 30% by 2040. The findings underscore the critical role of geological repositories, enhanced by emerging technologies, and highlight the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure secure, sustainable nuclear waste disposal aligned with global net-zero goals by 2050. By strengthening the scientific basis for next-generation disposal technologies, this study contributes on responsible management of hazardous materials

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2026.101042
Primary Topic
Nuclear materials and radiation effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Next-generation nuclear waste management: Geological repositories, emerging technologies, and global pathways

Deepak Kumar, Mahit Jain, Kulmani Mehar, Vasanthaseelan S et al.
Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances
Nuclear materials and radiation effects
article

Next-generation nuclear waste management: Geological repositories, emerging technologies, and global pathways

Deepak Kumar, Mahit Jain, Kulmani Mehar, Vasanthaseelan S, Sandeep G M, Shakti Prakash Jena, Ritesh Prathap Singh, Keerti Rai
article en

Abstract

• Global nuclear waste exceeds 370,000 tons, projected to 400,000 tons by 2035 • Geological repositories analyzed: Onkalo (5,500 t) and WIPP (175,000 m³) • Emerging solutions: borehole disposal, transmutation, vitrification, Synroc • Risk models show <1% failure probability with IAEA and EPA compliance • Future innovations: graphene barriers, robotics, and AI-enabled monitoring • Integrated strategies support safe, adaptive, and net-zero aligned disposal The safe management of nuclear waste remains a central challenge for sustaining nuclear energy in the low-carbon transition, with a global inventory exceeding 370,000 metric tons and increasing by 10,000 tons annually. This review synthesizes advances in waste classification, repository design, emerging disposal technologies, environmental safeguards, and future directions. Nuclear waste is categorized into low-level (90% volume, <1% radioactivity), intermediate-level (7% volume, 4% radioactivity), and high-level wastes (2% volume, >95% radioactivity), alongside highly radioactive spent fuel (10¹⁰–10¹⁴ Bq/g). Current strategies emphasize geological repositories such as Onkalo (5,500 tons, 400–500 m depth) and WIPP (175,000 m³, 655 m depth), which employ multi-barrier systems but face challenges including high heat output (10–20 kW/ton) and material durability (10⁻⁵/year corrosion). Complementary approaches deep borehole disposal (3–5 km depth, 1–2 billion USD), partitioning and transmutation (>90% toxicity reduction), and immobilization via vitrification (leach rate ∼10⁻⁶ g/m²/day) are advancing the safety and sustainability of disposal. Risk assessments, supported by IAEA safety standards, demonstrate <1% failure probability over 10,000 years, while future innovations in advanced materials (e.g., graphene by 2030), robotics (RADBOT deployment by 2028), and AI-driven monitoring (20% predictive improvement by 2035) could reduce long-term risks by 30% by 2040. The findings underscore the critical role of geological repositories, enhanced by emerging technologies, and highlight the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure secure, sustainable nuclear waste disposal aligned with global net-zero goals by 2050. By strengthening the scientific basis for next-generation disposal technologies, this study contributes on responsible management of hazardous materials

Journal of Hazardous Materials AdvancesVol. 21
Haramaya University (ET), Presidency University (IN), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur (IN), Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN), Parul University (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Nuclear materials and radiation effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.