Validation of the Japanese version of boredom proneness scale and derivation of its short version among older adults: a cross-sectional study

Boredom proneness is a common yet underexplored psychological trait among older adults, linked to depression, loneliness, and reduced quality of life. Despite its clinical relevance, validated instruments for assessing boredom in this population are scarce. This study aimed to validate the Japanese version of the Boredom Proneness Scale (JBPS) and to develop a short form specifically designed for older adults (s-BPSO). We conducted two cross-sectional surveys in Japan. The first, a paper-based survey (n = 5,382; mean age = 82), targeted community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 75 years in Sukagawa City. The second, an internet-based national survey (n = 4,124; mean age = 66), recruited participants aged ≥ 50 years. Structural validity of the JBPS was assessed via exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency and test–retest analysis. The s-BPSO was derived using item response theory and validated independently using data from the second survey. Convergent validity was examined through correlations with validated measures of mental and physical health. The JBPS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.87) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.84). Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure, though model fit in confirmatory analysis was modest. The JBPS showed strong correlations with depressive symptoms, loneliness, and HRQOL measures. Existing short versions of the BPS performed poorly in this older sample. A newly developed 6-item short version (s-BPSO) based on a two-factor structure exhibited acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.987, RMSEA = 0.056), high internal consistency (α = 0.80), and strong correlation with the full JBPS (r = 0.86). Higher boredom scores were associated with older age, lower income and education, reduced IADL, and lower HRQOL. The JBPS and s-BPSO are valid and reliable instruments for assessing boredom proneness among older Japanese adults. The s-BPSO provides a concise alternative for use in epidemiological surveys and clinical practice. These tools may inform interventions aimed at promoting active and mentally healthy aging, and support future cross-cultural research on aging-related psychological traits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02490-3
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Japanese version of boredom proneness scale and derivation of its short version among older adults: a cross-sectional study

Shunichi Fukuhara, Akihiro Ozaka, Izumi Uehara, Hiroaki Nakagawa et al.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Mind wandering and attention
article

Validation of the Japanese version of boredom proneness scale and derivation of its short version among older adults: a cross-sectional study

Shunichi Fukuhara, Akihiro Ozaka, Izumi Uehara, Hiroaki Nakagawa, Taro Takeshima, Takashi Yoshioka, Sugihiro Hamaguchi, Sayaka Shimizu, Kenji Omae, Atsushi Takayama
article en

Abstract

Boredom proneness is a common yet underexplored psychological trait among older adults, linked to depression, loneliness, and reduced quality of life. Despite its clinical relevance, validated instruments for assessing boredom in this population are scarce. This study aimed to validate the Japanese version of the Boredom Proneness Scale (JBPS) and to develop a short form specifically designed for older adults (s-BPSO). We conducted two cross-sectional surveys in Japan. The first, a paper-based survey (n = 5,382; mean age = 82), targeted community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 75 years in Sukagawa City. The second, an internet-based national survey (n = 4,124; mean age = 66), recruited participants aged ≥ 50 years. Structural validity of the JBPS was assessed via exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency and test–retest analysis. The s-BPSO was derived using item response theory and validated independently using data from the second survey. Convergent validity was examined through correlations with validated measures of mental and physical health. The JBPS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.87) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.84). Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure, though model fit in confirmatory analysis was modest. The JBPS showed strong correlations with depressive symptoms, loneliness, and HRQOL measures. Existing short versions of the BPS performed poorly in this older sample. A newly developed 6-item short version (s-BPSO) based on a two-factor structure exhibited acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.987, RMSEA = 0.056), high internal consistency (α = 0.80), and strong correlation with the full JBPS (r = 0.86). Higher boredom scores were associated with older age, lower income and education, reduced IADL, and lower HRQOL. The JBPS and s-BPSO are valid and reliable instruments for assessing boredom proneness among older Japanese adults. The s-BPSO provides a concise alternative for use in epidemiological surveys and clinical practice. These tools may inform interventions aimed at promoting active and mentally healthy aging, and support future cross-cultural research on aging-related psychological traits.

Health and Quality of Life OutcomesVol. 24(1)
SHOWA Medical University (JP), Fukushima Medical University (JP), Johns Hopkins University (US), Saitama Prefectural University (JP), Keio University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Ochanomizu University (JP), Fukushima Medical University Hospital (JP)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Mind wandering and attention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.