Baseline Human Metabolic Profiling and Risk of Death from COVID-19: Conceptualization of Multivariate Prediction Model Development via Retrospective Database Analysis in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Prediction models are implemented frequently, yet, compared with other study designs, their incorporation of clinical measurements (CMs; i.e., vital signs and laboratory results) is rather underdeveloped. The purpose is to describe methods used and illustrate clinical utility in parameters systematically derived from CMs; as a case study, we use the risk of all-cause mortality following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as the basis for prognosis. <b>Methods</b>: We identified cases through the Department of Veterans Affairs COVID-19 Shared Data Resource, utilizing data from the first visit until 14 days before testing positive. Thirteen parameters were derived from each of the 11 CMs, capturing departures from normality considering variability and time. The 143 candidate predictors were used to generate the main logistic regression model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis was performed to assess discrimination between those who lived and died for subset and main regressions; for comparison, this was performed for an age-only model and the Charlson Comorbidity and Elixhauser Indices. <b>Results</b>: There were 329,491 patients. The main model's AUROC (0.785 ± 0.002) was similar to the age-only model (0.783 ± 0.002; <i>p</i> > 0.05) and significantly greater than the comorbidity indices' (range: 0.675 ± 0.002 to 0.729 ± 0.002; <i>p</i> < 0.001 each). <b>Conclusions</b>: The study found several parameters were significant determinants of mortality following COVID-19, highlighting the importance of a systematic approach for multivariate modeling to obtain informative insights into underlying pathophysiology. The main model outperforms common comorbidity indices as a summary metric for pre-existing conditions in this case study. If validated, this approach could revolutionize the way CMs are handled in multivariate models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031212
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Baseline Human Metabolic Profiling and Risk of Death from COVID-19: Conceptualization of Multivariate Prediction Model Development via Retrospective Database Analysis in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Allison Murata, Glen H. Murata, Heather Campbell, Jenny T. Mao et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Baseline Human Metabolic Profiling and Risk of Death from COVID-19: Conceptualization of Multivariate Prediction Model Development via Retrospective Database Analysis in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Allison Murata, Glen H. Murata, Heather Campbell, Jenny T. Mao, Benjamin McMahon
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Prediction models are implemented frequently, yet, compared with other study designs, their incorporation of clinical measurements (CMs; i.e., vital signs and laboratory results) is rather underdeveloped. The purpose is to describe methods used and illustrate clinical utility in parameters systematically derived from CMs; as a case study, we use the risk of all-cause mortality following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as the basis for prognosis. <b>Methods</b>: We identified cases through the Department of Veterans Affairs COVID-19 Shared Data Resource, utilizing data from the first visit until 14 days before testing positive. Thirteen parameters were derived from each of the 11 CMs, capturing departures from normality considering variability and time. The 143 candidate predictors were used to generate the main logistic regression model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis was performed to assess discrimination between those who lived and died for subset and main regressions; for comparison, this was performed for an age-only model and the Charlson Comorbidity and Elixhauser Indices. <b>Results</b>: There were 329,491 patients. The main model's AUROC (0.785 ± 0.002) was similar to the age-only model (0.783 ± 0.002; <i>p</i> > 0.05) and significantly greater than the comorbidity indices' (range: 0.675 ± 0.002 to 0.729 ± 0.002; <i>p</i> < 0.001 each). <b>Conclusions</b>: The study found several parameters were significant determinants of mortality following COVID-19, highlighting the importance of a systematic approach for multivariate modeling to obtain informative insights into underlying pathophysiology. The main model outperforms common comorbidity indices as a summary metric for pre-existing conditions in this case study. If validated, this approach could revolutionize the way CMs are handled in multivariate models.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(3)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), University of New Mexico (US), University of California System (US), University of California San Diego (US), The Coordinating Center (US), VA San Diego Healthcare System (US), Advanced Emissions Solutions (United States) (US), New Mexico VA Health Care System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.