Synthesizing scientific literature with retrieval-augmented language models

Scientific progress depends on the ability of researchers to synthesize the growing body of literature. Can large language models (LLMs) assist scientists in this task? Here we introduce OpenScholar, a specialized retrieval-augmented language model (LM)<sup>1</sup> that answers scientific queries by identifying relevant passages from 45 million open-access papers and synthesizing citation-backed responses. To evaluate OpenScholar, we develop ScholarQABench, the first large-scale multi-domain benchmark for literature search, comprising 2,967 expert-written queries and 208 long-form answers across computer science, physics, neuroscience and biomedicine. Despite being a smaller open model, OpenScholar-8B outperforms GPT-4o by 6.1% and PaperQA2 by 5.5% in correctness on a challenging multi-paper synthesis task from the new ScholarQABench. Although GPT-4o hallucinates citations 78-90% of the time, OpenScholar achieves citation accuracy on par with human experts. OpenScholar's data store, retriever and self-feedback inference loop improve off-the-shelf LMs: for instance, OpenScholar-GPT-4o improves the correctness of GPT-4o by 12%. In human evaluations, experts preferred OpenScholar-8B and OpenScholar-GPT-4o responses over expert-written ones 51% and 70% of the time, respectively, compared with 32% for GPT-4o. We open-source all artefacts, including our code, models, data store, datasets and a public demo.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-10072-4
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
53.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synthesizing scientific literature with retrieval-augmented language models

Sergey Feldman, Pan Ji, Minyang Tian, Rulin Shao et al.
4 citations
Nature
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
53.11
article

Synthesizing scientific literature with retrieval-augmented language models

Sergey Feldman, Pan Ji, Minyang Tian, Rulin Shao, Jacqueline He, Yanyu Xiong, Kyle Shih-Huang Lo, Luca Soldaini, Shengyan Liu, Bohao Wu, Joseph Chee Chang, Amanpreet Singh, Daniel S. Weld, Akari Asai, Doug Downey, Varsha Kishore, David Wadden, Wen-tau Yih, Pang Wei Koh, Hao Tong, Graham Neubig, Jenna Sparks, Jena D. Hwang, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Weijia Shi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Scientific progress depends on the ability of researchers to synthesize the growing body of literature. Can large language models (LLMs) assist scientists in this task? Here we introduce OpenScholar, a specialized retrieval-augmented language model (LM)<sup>1</sup> that answers scientific queries by identifying relevant passages from 45 million open-access papers and synthesizing citation-backed responses. To evaluate OpenScholar, we develop ScholarQABench, the first large-scale multi-domain benchmark for literature search, comprising 2,967 expert-written queries and 208 long-form answers across computer science, physics, neuroscience and biomedicine. Despite being a smaller open model, OpenScholar-8B outperforms GPT-4o by 6.1% and PaperQA2 by 5.5% in correctness on a challenging multi-paper synthesis task from the new ScholarQABench. Although GPT-4o hallucinates citations 78-90% of the time, OpenScholar achieves citation accuracy on par with human experts. OpenScholar's data store, retriever and self-feedback inference loop improve off-the-shelf LMs: for instance, OpenScholar-GPT-4o improves the correctness of GPT-4o by 12%. In human evaluations, experts preferred OpenScholar-8B and OpenScholar-GPT-4o responses over expert-written ones 51% and 70% of the time, respectively, compared with 32% for GPT-4o. We open-source all artefacts, including our code, models, data store, datasets and a public demo.

NatureVol. 650(8103)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Washington (US), Allen Institute (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US), Stanford University (US)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation Singapore
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
53.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.