Why do effective tax rates fall with capital intensity?

This paper examines why corporate effective tax rates (ETRs) tend to decline as capital per worker increases. We decompose the ETR into two channels: a statutory cost-recovery component that mechanically lowers the taxable base with capital accumulation, and a discretionary tax-planning component whose effectiveness rises with capital intensity. Using firm-level data from six European countries, we estimate this relationship non-parametrically. We find that a 10% increase in capital intensity reduces the ETR by about 0.30 percentage points in Hungary, 0.11 points in Spain, and 0.10 points in Italy. By contrast, no significant relationship is found for France, Germany, and the UK, suggesting cross-country differences in cost-recovery provisions and enforcement environments. • Capital intensity is negatively associated with corporate effective tax rates. • Non-parametric methods reveal strong cross-country heterogeneity. • Capital accumulation lowers effective tax rates in Hungary, Italy, and Spain. • Cost-recovery provisions and tax planning jointly drive the ETR decline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2026.112827
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why do effective tax rates fall with capital intensity?

I. Bournakis, D. Christopoulos
Economics Letters
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Why do effective tax rates fall with capital intensity?

I. Bournakis, D. Christopoulos
article en

Abstract

This paper examines why corporate effective tax rates (ETRs) tend to decline as capital per worker increases. We decompose the ETR into two channels: a statutory cost-recovery component that mechanically lowers the taxable base with capital accumulation, and a discretionary tax-planning component whose effectiveness rises with capital intensity. Using firm-level data from six European countries, we estimate this relationship non-parametrically. We find that a 10% increase in capital intensity reduces the ETR by about 0.30 percentage points in Hungary, 0.11 points in Spain, and 0.10 points in Italy. By contrast, no significant relationship is found for France, Germany, and the UK, suggesting cross-country differences in cost-recovery provisions and enforcement environments. • Capital intensity is negatively associated with corporate effective tax rates. • Non-parametric methods reveal strong cross-country heterogeneity. • Capital accumulation lowers effective tax rates in Hungary, Italy, and Spain. • Cost-recovery provisions and tax planning jointly drive the ETR decline.

Economics LettersVol. 261
SKEMA Business School (FR), Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.