Shaping Inclusion and Exclusion: Habitual Responses of Project Managers in Early Stakeholder Engagement

This study explores how project managers in contentious contexts, such as infrastructure projects, shape the inclusion and exclusion of nonmarket stakeholders in early stakeholder engagement. Adopting open strategy theory as a lens, we focus on forms of closure in managerial decision-making. We show that even well-intentioned managers rely on habitual responses—favoring representatives, joint commitment, technical expertise, and internal legitimacy—at the expense of broader inclusion. Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analyses, we give meaning and significance to these patterns of exclusion and contribute to a more reflective and socially responsive approach to stakeholder engagement in the project front end.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Project Management Journal
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728261416375
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shaping Inclusion and Exclusion: Habitual Responses of Project Managers in Early Stakeholder Engagement

M. Baartmans, Tim Busscher, Stefan Verweij, Jos Arts
Project Management Journal
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Shaping Inclusion and Exclusion: Habitual Responses of Project Managers in Early Stakeholder Engagement

M. Baartmans, Tim Busscher, Stefan Verweij, Jos Arts
article en

Abstract

This study explores how project managers in contentious contexts, such as infrastructure projects, shape the inclusion and exclusion of nonmarket stakeholders in early stakeholder engagement. Adopting open strategy theory as a lens, we focus on forms of closure in managerial decision-making. We show that even well-intentioned managers rely on habitual responses—favoring representatives, joint commitment, technical expertise, and internal legitimacy—at the expense of broader inclusion. Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analyses, we give meaning and significance to these patterns of exclusion and contribute to a more reflective and socially responsive approach to stakeholder engagement in the project front end.

Project Management Journal
University of Groningen (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Shaping Inclusion and Exclusion: Habitual Responses of Project Managers in Early Stakeholder Engagement — M. Baartmans, Tim Busscher, et al. · Project Management Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS