Nursing student’s evaluation of how organisation and the scope of clinical hours impact learning

Background: Despite global acceptance for the importance of clinical learning in nurse education there is limited evidence for the scope of hours needed to ensure learning outcomes. Aims: To explore how organisation and the scope of clinical hours impact students’ learning. Method: Cross-sectional survey with open- and close-ended questions. Results: Responding students (N=169/42%) had mixed opinions of five-day clinical weeks and five-week clinical periods but agreed that two consecutive placements and combined learning approaches promoted learning. Academic assignments during clinical periods, and weeks of self-directed learning were considered unhelpful. Rather, students emphasized the importance of involvement in daily work and nursing care, one learning approach at a time, support and feedback, and time to prepare, reflect and seek knowledge relevant for placement wards. Conclusion: Our results, and limited evidence of how organisation and the scope of clinical hours impact nursing student’s learning underscore a need for more knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18261/nsf.15.4.6
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nursing student’s evaluation of how organisation and the scope of clinical hours impact learning

Hilde Knudsrød, Helene Margrethe Storebø Opheim, Berit Taraldsen Valeberg, Liv Karin Bjerkvik
Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning
Nursing education and management
article

Nursing student’s evaluation of how organisation and the scope of clinical hours impact learning

Hilde Knudsrød, Helene Margrethe Storebø Opheim, Berit Taraldsen Valeberg, Liv Karin Bjerkvik
article en

Abstract

Background: Despite global acceptance for the importance of clinical learning in nurse education there is limited evidence for the scope of hours needed to ensure learning outcomes. Aims: To explore how organisation and the scope of clinical hours impact students’ learning. Method: Cross-sectional survey with open- and close-ended questions. Results: Responding students (N=169/42%) had mixed opinions of five-day clinical weeks and five-week clinical periods but agreed that two consecutive placements and combined learning approaches promoted learning. Academic assignments during clinical periods, and weeks of self-directed learning were considered unhelpful. Rather, students emphasized the importance of involvement in daily work and nursing care, one learning approach at a time, support and feedback, and time to prepare, reflect and seek knowledge relevant for placement wards. Conclusion: Our results, and limited evidence of how organisation and the scope of clinical hours impact nursing student’s learning underscore a need for more knowledge.

Nordisk SygeplejeforskningVol. 15(4)
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Metropolitan University (BD), Universidad Metropolitana (PR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nursing student’s evaluation of how organisation and the scope of clinical hours impact learning — Hilde Knudsrød, Helene Margrethe Storebø Opheim, et al. · Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS