Directed technological change, factor adjustment, and GDP: Two decompositions with OECD evidence

• Decomposes the technological effect on GDP into neutral and non-neutral components. 1 1 Funded by the European Union - NextGenerationEU, Mission 4 Component 2 - ECS00000036 - CUP[B63B22000010001]. • Disentangles pure factor productivity effects from those driven by factor adjustments. • Non-neutral component accounts for most OECD productivity growth (1994–2019). • Technology-induced factor adjustments explain most OECD productivity growth. • Capital is the primary source of technology-induced OECD productivity growth. . We propose a growth-accounting approach based on a time-varying Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) production function that decomposes the total technological effect on GDP into neutral and non-neutral components, separating pure productivity from effects induced by factor-quantity adjustments. Applied to a balanced panel of 32 OECD countries (1994–2019), the method shows that most of the technological impact on GDP arises from non-neutral components operating mainly through adjustments in factor composition and quantities, while the direct productivity contribution is often weak or negative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2026.112857
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Productivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Directed technological change, factor adjustment, and GDP: Two decompositions with OECD evidence

Christophe Feder, Cristiano Antonelli
Economics Letters
Economic Growth and Productivity
article

Directed technological change, factor adjustment, and GDP: Two decompositions with OECD evidence

Christophe Feder, Cristiano Antonelli
article en

Abstract

• Decomposes the technological effect on GDP into neutral and non-neutral components. 1 1 Funded by the European Union - NextGenerationEU, Mission 4 Component 2 - ECS00000036 - CUP[B63B22000010001]. • Disentangles pure factor productivity effects from those driven by factor adjustments. • Non-neutral component accounts for most OECD productivity growth (1994–2019). • Technology-induced factor adjustments explain most OECD productivity growth. • Capital is the primary source of technology-induced OECD productivity growth. . We propose a growth-accounting approach based on a time-varying Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) production function that decomposes the total technological effect on GDP into neutral and non-neutral components, separating pure productivity from effects induced by factor-quantity adjustments. Applied to a balanced panel of 32 OECD countries (1994–2019), the method shows that most of the technological impact on GDP arises from non-neutral components operating mainly through adjustments in factor composition and quantities, while the direct productivity contribution is often weak or negative.

Economics LettersVol. 261
University of Aosta Valley (IT), University of Turin (IT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Economic Growth and Productivity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.