Consumer Insights into “Clean Label” High-Fat, Low-Carbohydrate Protein Bars

This study assessed consumer perceptions of high-fat, low-carbohydrate (HFLC) protein bars containing varying levels of beef tallow fat. A consumer acceptability test was conducted (n = 102) with four prepared and one commercially available HFLC bar samples. Hedonic, diagnostic (intensity), and just-about-right (JAR) questions on overall liking, texture, flavor, and purchase intent were included in the sample evaluation ballot, followed by general demographic, consumption behavior, and ingredient preference questions about the product category. Although none of the samples, including the commercial bar, were liked, the sample with the highest protein content and lowest fat content was preferred over the others. Overall flavor and aroma liking were rated significantly higher for all prepared samples compared with the commercial bar (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). The sample evaluation revealed potential pathways for improving HFLC bars by leveraging "fat-synergizing" attributes such as sweetness, saltiness, and spiciness, with texture improvements possible through higher lean-protein incorporation. The ingredient factors most important to the participants were high protein content, high satiety, minimal ingredients, natural ingredients, and no added sugar. This study's results demonstrate a widespread desire for fewer ingredients overall, more natural ingredients, and high satiation in snack products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15030551
Primary Topic
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer Insights into “Clean Label” High-Fat, Low-Carbohydrate Protein Bars

Jordan Proctor, Md. Shakir Moazzem, William L. Kerr, Koushik Adhikari et al.
Foods
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
article

Consumer Insights into “Clean Label” High-Fat, Low-Carbohydrate Protein Bars

Jordan Proctor, Md. Shakir Moazzem, William L. Kerr, Koushik Adhikari, Mackenzie J. Bui, Meghan M. Stewart
article en

Abstract

This study assessed consumer perceptions of high-fat, low-carbohydrate (HFLC) protein bars containing varying levels of beef tallow fat. A consumer acceptability test was conducted (n = 102) with four prepared and one commercially available HFLC bar samples. Hedonic, diagnostic (intensity), and just-about-right (JAR) questions on overall liking, texture, flavor, and purchase intent were included in the sample evaluation ballot, followed by general demographic, consumption behavior, and ingredient preference questions about the product category. Although none of the samples, including the commercial bar, were liked, the sample with the highest protein content and lowest fat content was preferred over the others. Overall flavor and aroma liking were rated significantly higher for all prepared samples compared with the commercial bar (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). The sample evaluation revealed potential pathways for improving HFLC bars by leveraging "fat-synergizing" attributes such as sweetness, saltiness, and spiciness, with texture improvements possible through higher lean-protein incorporation. The ingredient factors most important to the participants were high protein content, high satiety, minimal ingredients, natural ingredients, and no added sugar. This study's results demonstrate a widespread desire for fewer ingredients overall, more natural ingredients, and high satiation in snack products.

FoodsVol. 15(3)
University of Georgia (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Consumer Insights into “Clean Label” High-Fat, Low-Carbohydrate Protein Bars — Jordan Proctor, Md. Shakir Moazzem, et al. · Foods (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS