Risk Scale to Guide Prophylactic Paraspinous Flap Closure in High-Risk Spine Surgery

Wound failure after posterior spine surgery can lead to infection, hardware loss, and reoperation. Prophylactic paraspinous muscle flaps are used selectively, but the criteria to select which patients benefit most have not been consistent.We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2011-2022) of complex posterior spine operations closed by plastic surgery at a single center. The exposure was a prophylactic paraspinous flap at the index operation versus standard primary closure. The primary outcome was a plastic surgery-managed wound complication requiring clinical intervention or return to the operating room. Using only routine pre- and intraoperative variables, we created a five-factor bedside score (obesity; lumbar/sacral level; albumin < 35 g/L [3.5 g/dL]; operative time > 250 minutes; American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] class ≥ 3) and a parallel logistic model that excluded treatment to estimate baseline risk and support decision making.Among 281 operations, 150/281 (53%) received prophylactic paraspinous closure. Plastic-surgery-managed wound complications occurred in 35/281 (12.5%). A simple baseline-risk model separated patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups with observed complication rates of 7.9, 11.7, and 23.2%, respectively. Model performance was modest (area under the ROC curve [AUC] 0.66; optimism-corrected AUC 0.56; Brier 0.106). In adjusted analyses, ASA ≥ 3 was associated with higher odds of a wound complication (adjusted OR: 9.35; 95% CI: 1.20-73.02). In the high-risk (4-5 points) group of the five-factor score, prophylactic closure reduced reoperations from 20.0% (4/20) to 0% (0/27; absolute risk reduction: 20%; number needed to treat: 5; <i>p</i> = 0.027). No significant differences were seen in the lower-risk groups.A simple five-factor score stratifies baseline wound risk after posterior spine surgery and identifies patients most likely to benefit from prophylactic paraspinous flap closure. Selective, preoperative use in high-risk patients may reduce returns to the operating room.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2803-4814
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Scale to Guide Prophylactic Paraspinous Flap Closure in High-Risk Spine Surgery

Kevin Schlidt, Allison Karwoski, Esther Jung, Yvonne Rasko
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Risk Scale to Guide Prophylactic Paraspinous Flap Closure in High-Risk Spine Surgery

Kevin Schlidt, Allison Karwoski, Esther Jung, Yvonne Rasko
article en

Abstract

Wound failure after posterior spine surgery can lead to infection, hardware loss, and reoperation. Prophylactic paraspinous muscle flaps are used selectively, but the criteria to select which patients benefit most have not been consistent.We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2011-2022) of complex posterior spine operations closed by plastic surgery at a single center. The exposure was a prophylactic paraspinous flap at the index operation versus standard primary closure. The primary outcome was a plastic surgery-managed wound complication requiring clinical intervention or return to the operating room. Using only routine pre- and intraoperative variables, we created a five-factor bedside score (obesity; lumbar/sacral level; albumin < 35 g/L [3.5 g/dL]; operative time > 250 minutes; American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] class ≥ 3) and a parallel logistic model that excluded treatment to estimate baseline risk and support decision making.Among 281 operations, 150/281 (53%) received prophylactic paraspinous closure. Plastic-surgery-managed wound complications occurred in 35/281 (12.5%). A simple baseline-risk model separated patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups with observed complication rates of 7.9, 11.7, and 23.2%, respectively. Model performance was modest (area under the ROC curve [AUC] 0.66; optimism-corrected AUC 0.56; Brier 0.106). In adjusted analyses, ASA ≥ 3 was associated with higher odds of a wound complication (adjusted OR: 9.35; 95% CI: 1.20-73.02). In the high-risk (4-5 points) group of the five-factor score, prophylactic closure reduced reoperations from 20.0% (4/20) to 0% (0/27; absolute risk reduction: 20%; number needed to treat: 5; <i>p</i> = 0.027). No significant differences were seen in the lower-risk groups.A simple five-factor score stratifies baseline wound risk after posterior spine surgery and identifies patients most likely to benefit from prophylactic paraspinous flap closure. Selective, preoperative use in high-risk patients may reduce returns to the operating room.

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Sinai Hospital (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.