Streamflow Elasticity to Precipitation Distribution and Potential Evapotranspiration Across South America

ABSTRACT This study examines the sensitivity of mean, high and low streamflows (i.e., Q elasticity) to changes in precipitation (P) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) across South America. The response to P was further assessed by intensifying its seasonal and daily distribution, specifically by increasing (decreasing) P during wet (dry) periods and high (low) events, while maintaining the annual P volume unchanged. Simulations from a continental‐scale hydrological model indicate that Q exhibits a stronger response to increases in P than to decreases. Arid and semi‐arid regions exhibited the highest Q elasticities and amplification of changes in P and PET, whereas in humid regions these effects were lower in magnitude. PET impacts were strongest on low flows ( Q low ) in the Caatinga and on mean/high flows ( Q mean / Q high ) in Pantanal and Pampa biomes. The Q response to P depends not only on the amount of rainfall but also on how and when it occurs. Seasonal intensification reduced Q low (median −6%) and increased Q mean (+4%) and Q high (+12%), whereas daily intensification yielded −6%, +3% and +6% for Q low , Q mean and Q high , respectively, in response to a 20% alteration in P distribution. Sensitivity to seasonal P distribution scaled with baseline seasonality, and unimodal regimes exhibited larger seasonal elasticities than bimodal regimes. Overall, in seasonal regions, the seasonal redistribution of P has stronger effects on extreme flows. Accordingly, streamflow elasticity provides a quantitative framework to assess regional and biome‐specific responses to climate variability and to inform projections of hydrological change across watersheds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70386
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Streamflow Elasticity to Precipitation Distribution and Potential Evapotranspiration Across South America

R. C. D. de Paiva, V. A. Siqueira, A. Kolling Neto, J. P. L. F. Brêda et al.
Hydrological Processes
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Streamflow Elasticity to Precipitation Distribution and Potential Evapotranspiration Across South America

R. C. D. de Paiva, V. A. Siqueira, A. Kolling Neto, J. P. L. F. Brêda, W. Collischonn
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the sensitivity of mean, high and low streamflows (i.e., Q elasticity) to changes in precipitation (P) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) across South America. The response to P was further assessed by intensifying its seasonal and daily distribution, specifically by increasing (decreasing) P during wet (dry) periods and high (low) events, while maintaining the annual P volume unchanged. Simulations from a continental‐scale hydrological model indicate that Q exhibits a stronger response to increases in P than to decreases. Arid and semi‐arid regions exhibited the highest Q elasticities and amplification of changes in P and PET, whereas in humid regions these effects were lower in magnitude. PET impacts were strongest on low flows ( Q low ) in the Caatinga and on mean/high flows ( Q mean / Q high ) in Pantanal and Pampa biomes. The Q response to P depends not only on the amount of rainfall but also on how and when it occurs. Seasonal intensification reduced Q low (median −6%) and increased Q mean (+4%) and Q high (+12%), whereas daily intensification yielded −6%, +3% and +6% for Q low , Q mean and Q high , respectively, in response to a 20% alteration in P distribution. Sensitivity to seasonal P distribution scaled with baseline seasonality, and unimodal regimes exhibited larger seasonal elasticities than bimodal regimes. Overall, in seasonal regions, the seasonal redistribution of P has stronger effects on extreme flows. Accordingly, streamflow elasticity provides a quantitative framework to assess regional and biome‐specific responses to climate variability and to inform projections of hydrological change across watersheds.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 40(2)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Lund University (SE)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.