Labeling to Help? Special Education Identification and Academic and Nonacademic Outcomes

This study examined associations between special education services and academic and behavioral outcomes for students identified with learning disabilities (LD) using statewide data from Indiana covering kindergarten through eighth grade. Results from student fixed-effects models indicate that special education services are associated with higher achievement in math and English language arts, but also with increased school disciplinary incidents, including suspensions and expulsions, and higher numbers of absences. These associations differ across student subgroups, including gender, race/ethnicity, eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch, and English language learner status. The findings underscore the complex nature of special education services, highlighting heterogeneous patterns across both outcomes and student subgroups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09388982261416140
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labeling to Help? Special Education Identification and Academic and Nonacademic Outcomes

NaYoung Hwang
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

Labeling to Help? Special Education Identification and Academic and Nonacademic Outcomes

NaYoung Hwang
article en

Abstract

This study examined associations between special education services and academic and behavioral outcomes for students identified with learning disabilities (LD) using statewide data from Indiana covering kindergarten through eighth grade. Results from student fixed-effects models indicate that special education services are associated with higher achievement in math and English language arts, but also with increased school disciplinary incidents, including suspensions and expulsions, and higher numbers of absences. These associations differ across student subgroups, including gender, race/ethnicity, eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch, and English language learner status. The findings underscore the complex nature of special education services, highlighting heterogeneous patterns across both outcomes and student subgroups.

Learning Disabilities Research and Practice
University of New Hampshire at Manchester (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.