Sustainable biodiesel production: A comparative analysis of fuel properties from non‐edible oil and waste‐derived feedstock

Abstract This study explores biodiesel production from four non‐edible feedstocks: palm kernel oil (PKO), beef fat (BF), used cooking oil (UCO), and African star apple seed oil (ASASO). Biodiesel samples were produced from the four feedstocks, and their fuel properties, including yield, flash‐point, oxidative stability, viscosity, density, calorific value, acid value, free fatty acid, iodine value, saponification value, and cetane number, were determined and compared with conventional diesel. The obtained data were statistically analyzed. Investigated biodiesel samples exhibited varying yields, ranging from 74% for ASASO to 92% for PKO. All biodiesel samples met key international standards (ASTM D6751) for flash point (i.e., 128–148°C), oxidative stability (i.e., 3.15–3.62 h), viscosity (i.e., 4.82–6.85 mm 2 /s), and density (i.e., 0.827–0.918 g/cm 3 ), supporting their safety and usability. However, their calorific values (i.e., 27.65–33.15 MJ/kg) were significantly lower than that of diesel (i.e., 38.11 MJ/kg). This study supports the viability of biodiesel as a sustainable diesel alternative, highlighting the importance of feedstock selection and process optimization. The findings suggest that used cooking oil and beef fat biodiesel fuels have potential as sustainable diesel alternatives, warranting further research and development. The study is limited by the small number of feedstocks, the absence of engine‐performance and emission testing, and the lack of both biodiesel diesel blend evaluation and economic or life‐cycle assessment factors that restrict direct conclusions about large‐scale or real‐world performance. These limitations highlight the need for future work incorporating broader feedstock selections, blend studies, techno‐economic, and environmental analyses for commercialization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.70354
Primary Topic
Biodiesel Production and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable biodiesel production: A comparative analysis of fuel properties from non‐edible oil and waste‐derived feedstock

Sesan Abiodun Aransiola, Naga Raju Maddela, Oluremi Isola Adeniran, Ram Prasad et al.
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Biodiesel Production and Applications
article

Sustainable biodiesel production: A comparative analysis of fuel properties from non‐edible oil and waste‐derived feedstock

Sesan Abiodun Aransiola, Naga Raju Maddela, Oluremi Isola Adeniran, Ram Prasad, Nifu Barnabas Joseph
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explores biodiesel production from four non‐edible feedstocks: palm kernel oil (PKO), beef fat (BF), used cooking oil (UCO), and African star apple seed oil (ASASO). Biodiesel samples were produced from the four feedstocks, and their fuel properties, including yield, flash‐point, oxidative stability, viscosity, density, calorific value, acid value, free fatty acid, iodine value, saponification value, and cetane number, were determined and compared with conventional diesel. The obtained data were statistically analyzed. Investigated biodiesel samples exhibited varying yields, ranging from 74% for ASASO to 92% for PKO. All biodiesel samples met key international standards (ASTM D6751) for flash point (i.e., 128–148°C), oxidative stability (i.e., 3.15–3.62 h), viscosity (i.e., 4.82–6.85 mm 2 /s), and density (i.e., 0.827–0.918 g/cm 3 ), supporting their safety and usability. However, their calorific values (i.e., 27.65–33.15 MJ/kg) were significantly lower than that of diesel (i.e., 38.11 MJ/kg). This study supports the viability of biodiesel as a sustainable diesel alternative, highlighting the importance of feedstock selection and process optimization. The findings suggest that used cooking oil and beef fat biodiesel fuels have potential as sustainable diesel alternatives, warranting further research and development. The study is limited by the small number of feedstocks, the absence of engine‐performance and emission testing, and the lack of both biodiesel diesel blend evaluation and economic or life‐cycle assessment factors that restrict direct conclusions about large‐scale or real‐world performance. These limitations highlight the need for future work incorporating broader feedstock selections, blend studies, techno‐economic, and environmental analyses for commercialization.

Environmental Progress & Sustainable EnergyVol. 45(2)
Universidad Técnica de Manabí (EC), Mahatma Gandhi Central University, University of Abuja (NG)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Biodiesel Production and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.