Global determinants of home range sizes in felids: Evidence of human disturbance impact

Home range (HR) is a key indicator of animal spatial ecology. HR size, shape, location and habitat composition reflect both species' ecological requirements and their responses to anthropogenic stressors. Felidae, a charismatic taxon, faces escalating threats mainly due to habitat degradation and human-wildlife conflict. Understanding the ecological and anthropogenic drivers of HR size variation is therefore critical for their conservation. To address this gap and explore these factors at a global scale for the entire taxon, we used the HomeRange database-a global database with HR values across 960 different mammal species-complemented with about 20% additional records, to compile 1137 individual HR size estimates from 29 out of 40 recognized wild felid species. We applied generalized linear mixed models to assess the influence of intrinsic, methodological, ecological and anthropogenic factors on space use. HR size was shaped by multiple drivers. It increased with body mass (0.94 ± 0.16; p < 10<sup>-8</sup>) and was larger in males than in females (0.51 ± 0.07; p < 10<sup>-13</sup>), consistent with higher energy demands and sex-specific reproductive strategies. HR size decreased with increasing productivity (-0.37 ± 0.07; p < 10<sup>-7</sup>) and felid richness (-0.24 ± 0.10; p = 0.02), suggesting reduced spatial requirements in resource-rich areas and under interspecific competition. HR size also decreased with increasing croplands (HR: -0.50 ± 0.14; p < 10<sup>-3</sup>) and pastures (HR: -0.16 ± 0.07; p = 0.02)-both human footprint proxies-which may reflect multiple causes such as anthropogenic food sources, habitat loss or movement restriction from infrastructures associated with agriculture. Our results reinforce the role of well-known established HR size's predictors such as body mass, sex and primary productivity while highlighting the impact of less frequently investigated factors (i.e. felid richness and agricultural land-use). Our findings emphasize the importance of incorporating a broad range of biological, environmental and methodological predictors when studying space use across a taxonomic group. Our approach provides novel insights into habitat requirements and the effects of anthropogenic pressures, which can ultimately lead to improved conservation strategies for felids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Ecology
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70227
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global determinants of home range sizes in felids: Evidence of human disturbance impact

Stefano Anile, S. Devillard, Arthemis Moraru
Journal of Animal Ecology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Global determinants of home range sizes in felids: Evidence of human disturbance impact

Stefano Anile, S. Devillard, Arthemis Moraru
article en

Abstract

Home range (HR) is a key indicator of animal spatial ecology. HR size, shape, location and habitat composition reflect both species' ecological requirements and their responses to anthropogenic stressors. Felidae, a charismatic taxon, faces escalating threats mainly due to habitat degradation and human-wildlife conflict. Understanding the ecological and anthropogenic drivers of HR size variation is therefore critical for their conservation. To address this gap and explore these factors at a global scale for the entire taxon, we used the HomeRange database-a global database with HR values across 960 different mammal species-complemented with about 20% additional records, to compile 1137 individual HR size estimates from 29 out of 40 recognized wild felid species. We applied generalized linear mixed models to assess the influence of intrinsic, methodological, ecological and anthropogenic factors on space use. HR size was shaped by multiple drivers. It increased with body mass (0.94 ± 0.16; p < 10<sup>-8</sup>) and was larger in males than in females (0.51 ± 0.07; p < 10<sup>-13</sup>), consistent with higher energy demands and sex-specific reproductive strategies. HR size decreased with increasing productivity (-0.37 ± 0.07; p < 10<sup>-7</sup>) and felid richness (-0.24 ± 0.10; p = 0.02), suggesting reduced spatial requirements in resource-rich areas and under interspecific competition. HR size also decreased with increasing croplands (HR: -0.50 ± 0.14; p < 10<sup>-3</sup>) and pastures (HR: -0.16 ± 0.07; p = 0.02)-both human footprint proxies-which may reflect multiple causes such as anthropogenic food sources, habitat loss or movement restriction from infrastructures associated with agriculture. Our results reinforce the role of well-known established HR size's predictors such as body mass, sex and primary productivity while highlighting the impact of less frequently investigated factors (i.e. felid richness and agricultural land-use). Our findings emphasize the importance of incorporating a broad range of biological, environmental and methodological predictors when studying space use across a taxonomic group. Our approach provides novel insights into habitat requirements and the effects of anthropogenic pressures, which can ultimately lead to improved conservation strategies for felids.

Journal of Animal Ecology
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive (FR), École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État (FR), University of Palermo (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.