Yes, There is an Economic Consensus That Professional Sports Facilities are Inadvisable Public Investments: A Reply to Johnson, Fort, and Rosentraub

In a recent issue of Economic Development Quarterly , Johnson et al. took issue with the contention that there is a strong scholarly consensus that professional sports facilities are not advisable public investments. Johnson et al. argued that opinion surveys of economists may be flawed, research reaches somewhat ambiguous conclusions, and that existing reviews of academic literature do not provide a balanced assessment of the evidence. Thus, Johnson et al. concluded that a judicious policy approach requires weighing the costs and benefits of individual stadium projects. This reply evaluates these claims and demonstrates that they do not have merit; therefore, it is accurate to describe the academic consensus as generally opposed to public underwriting of professional sports venues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Development Quarterly
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424261418035
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Yes, There is an Economic Consensus That Professional Sports Facilities are Inadvisable Public Investments: A Reply to Johnson, Fort, and Rosentraub

John Charles Bradbury, Brad R. Humphreys
Economic Development Quarterly
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Yes, There is an Economic Consensus That Professional Sports Facilities are Inadvisable Public Investments: A Reply to Johnson, Fort, and Rosentraub

John Charles Bradbury, Brad R. Humphreys
article en

Abstract

In a recent issue of Economic Development Quarterly , Johnson et al. took issue with the contention that there is a strong scholarly consensus that professional sports facilities are not advisable public investments. Johnson et al. argued that opinion surveys of economists may be flawed, research reaches somewhat ambiguous conclusions, and that existing reviews of academic literature do not provide a balanced assessment of the evidence. Thus, Johnson et al. concluded that a judicious policy approach requires weighing the costs and benefits of individual stadium projects. This reply evaluates these claims and demonstrates that they do not have merit; therefore, it is accurate to describe the academic consensus as generally opposed to public underwriting of professional sports venues.

Economic Development Quarterly
West Virginia University (US), Kennesaw State University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.