Indian Landlords and Socialist Votes

Abstract In the second decade of the twentieth century, Oklahoma hosted the largest state Socialist Party in the United States. The poor white farmers who formed its base hoped that their representatives would release them from local landlords, banks, and creditors. But these tenants and sharecroppers vented their grievances from inside a shattered landscape of recent and ongoing Indigenous dispossession. They could not entomb Native people entirely inside the past, because they confronted a great deal of Indian landownership. Oklahoma Socialists observed how politicians, lawyers, and businessmen grew fat on Indian resources and the deliberate pursuit of injury, fraud, and deception. But they evaded a direct attack on American colonial expansion and instead condemned its capitalist character. Capitalists, they argued, had first conquered the Indians, and now they had created an oppressed agricultural working class. In Oklahoma, radical economic dissent intersected with US imperial policy. Modern leftist politics helped justify and conceal the outcomes of conquest.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural History
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00021482-12174719
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indian Landlords and Socialist Votes

Sarah T. Phillips
Agricultural History
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Indian Landlords and Socialist Votes

Sarah T. Phillips
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the second decade of the twentieth century, Oklahoma hosted the largest state Socialist Party in the United States. The poor white farmers who formed its base hoped that their representatives would release them from local landlords, banks, and creditors. But these tenants and sharecroppers vented their grievances from inside a shattered landscape of recent and ongoing Indigenous dispossession. They could not entomb Native people entirely inside the past, because they confronted a great deal of Indian landownership. Oklahoma Socialists observed how politicians, lawyers, and businessmen grew fat on Indian resources and the deliberate pursuit of injury, fraud, and deception. But they evaded a direct attack on American colonial expansion and instead condemned its capitalist character. Capitalists, they argued, had first conquered the Indians, and now they had created an oppressed agricultural working class. In Oklahoma, radical economic dissent intersected with US imperial policy. Modern leftist politics helped justify and conceal the outcomes of conquest.

Agricultural HistoryVol. 100(1)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.