Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2009-2025: Broad scope and implementation-A progress report

Since its first activities in 2008 and 2009, the Response Assessment in NeuroOncology (RANO) group has given guidance on response assessment, trial design, and trial procedures to improve and standardize the way clinical trials in neurooncological studies are performed. To achieve its objectives, a variety of working groups have been initiated that cover many aspects of clinical trial design and outcome assessment in patients with tumors affecting the Central Nervous System. The RANO working groups are built on expertise without a formal structure, which makes rapid responses to new developments possible. RANO is aiming at evidence-based guidelines and recommendations, but in the absence of evidence will provide consensus-based guidance achieved by inviting recognized international experts. In its 15 years of existence, more than 60 RANO papers have been published mostly in high-ranking journals, and its recommendations have been accepted by regulators and industry as guiding principles. RANO organizes two meetings per year, one in conjunction with the annual American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting, and one during the annual Society for Neuro-Oncology meeting. These meetings are open, as are the working groups of RANO. New initiatives are welcomed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-284588
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2009-2025: Broad scope and implementation-A progress report

Annick Desjardins, N Galldiks, Jason Huse, José Pablo Leone et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) 2009-2025: Broad scope and implementation-A progress report

Annick Desjardins, N Galldiks, Jason Huse, José Pablo Leone, Joshua Budhu, Lakshmi Nayak, Edward K. Avila, Ashlee R. Loughan, Prof David M Mirsky, Philipp Karschnia, Tito Mendoza, Johan Koekkoek, Florien Boele, Martin Van Den Bent, Eudocia Lee, Raymond Huang, Arjun Sahgal, et al., Emilie Le Rhun, Spyridon Bakas, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Minesh Mehta, Michael A Vogelbaum, Ugonma Chukwueke, Timothy Cloughesy, Nathalie Albert, Mary Jane Lim-Fat, Michelle Kim, Jason Fangusaro
article en

Abstract

Since its first activities in 2008 and 2009, the Response Assessment in NeuroOncology (RANO) group has given guidance on response assessment, trial design, and trial procedures to improve and standardize the way clinical trials in neurooncological studies are performed. To achieve its objectives, a variety of working groups have been initiated that cover many aspects of clinical trial design and outcome assessment in patients with tumors affecting the Central Nervous System. The RANO working groups are built on expertise without a formal structure, which makes rapid responses to new developments possible. RANO is aiming at evidence-based guidelines and recommendations, but in the absence of evidence will provide consensus-based guidance achieved by inviting recognized international experts. In its 15 years of existence, more than 60 RANO papers have been published mostly in high-ranking journals, and its recommendations have been accepted by regulators and industry as guiding principles. RANO organizes two meetings per year, one in conjunction with the annual American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting, and one during the annual Society for Neuro-Oncology meeting. These meetings are open, as are the working groups of RANO. New initiatives are welcomed.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.