Geometric Causal Intelligence and the Structural Limit of Quantum Computation

Description (Abstract): Quantum computing is widely framed as the ultimate accelerator of computation. This paper clarifies a categorical limitation of that framing: even a maximally powerful quantum computer remains a downstream execution engine. It accelerates computation over an already admitted state space, but it does not perform causal admissibility filtering prior to execution. Geometric Causal Intelligence (GCI) operates at a different logical layer. Rather than accelerating evaluation, GCI eliminates causally inadmissible routes before execution-scale computation occurs. As a result, the performance advantage of GCI, measured in Speed Per Precise Result (SPPR), defined as time per correct deterministic decision, is structural rather than incremental. Increasing computational power, classical or quantum, does not close this gap. This paper establishes the orthogonality between GCI and quantum computing, formalizes the distinction between upstream and downstream computation, and explains why SPPR constitutes a hard boundary that compute scaling cannot cross.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18479835
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geometric Causal Intelligence and the Structural Limit of Quantum Computation

Jorge Vasconcelos
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Geometric Causal Intelligence and the Structural Limit of Quantum Computation

Jorge Vasconcelos
article en

Abstract

Description (Abstract): Quantum computing is widely framed as the ultimate accelerator of computation. This paper clarifies a categorical limitation of that framing: even a maximally powerful quantum computer remains a downstream execution engine. It accelerates computation over an already admitted state space, but it does not perform causal admissibility filtering prior to execution. Geometric Causal Intelligence (GCI) operates at a different logical layer. Rather than accelerating evaluation, GCI eliminates causally inadmissible routes before execution-scale computation occurs. As a result, the performance advantage of GCI, measured in Speed Per Precise Result (SPPR), defined as time per correct deterministic decision, is structural rather than incremental. Increasing computational power, classical or quantum, does not close this gap. This paper establishes the orthogonality between GCI and quantum computing, formalizes the distinction between upstream and downstream computation, and explains why SPPR constitutes a hard boundary that compute scaling cannot cross.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geometric Causal Intelligence and the Structural Limit of Quantum Computation — Jorge Vasconcelos · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS