Blind Will: Schelling, Schopenhauer, and the Problem of Evil

This dissertation examines the affinities and differences between Arthur Schopenhauer’s system and F. W. J. Schelling’s work from the period 1809-1821. Both philosophers argue for some conception of “blind will,” or striving devoid of rationality, as metaphysically foundational and as accounting for life’s pervasive and constitutive suffering. I begin by showing the roots of this idea in Immanuel Kant’s philosophy, and I conclude by arguing that Schopenhauer and Schelling offer competing accounts of the nature of liberation from this will. While Schopenhauerian liberation entails disengagement from the world, Schellingian liberation is possible only through active engagement with the world in a spirit of love.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)
Published
2025-12-13
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blind Will: Schelling, Schopenhauer, and the Problem of Evil

Robert McKinley
UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Blind Will: Schelling, Schopenhauer, and the Problem of Evil

Robert McKinley
article en

Abstract

This dissertation examines the affinities and differences between Arthur Schopenhauer’s system and F. W. J. Schelling’s work from the period 1809-1821. Both philosophers argue for some conception of “blind will,” or striving devoid of rationality, as metaphysically foundational and as accounting for life’s pervasive and constitutive suffering. I begin by showing the roots of this idea in Immanuel Kant’s philosophy, and I conclude by arguing that Schopenhauer and Schelling offer competing accounts of the nature of liberation from this will. While Schopenhauerian liberation entails disengagement from the world, Schellingian liberation is possible only through active engagement with the world in a spirit of love.

UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Blind Will: Schelling, Schopenhauer, and the Problem of Evil — Robert McKinley · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS