Unfinished Modernity and the Idea of the Tékhnē. From Multiple Realities to Fourth Dimension: (East)European Avant-Garde Cases.

The Avant-garde’s turn toward technology was not simply an infatuation with mechanical novelty. It was a metaphysical gambit—a wager that the machine, far from annihilating the aesthetic, might become its crucible. The embrace of technology was, in this sense, a profound act of reorientation: artists and thinkers who had once viewed machinery as the emblem of alienation began to see in it the raw material for a new poetics of the modern. This shift was neither naïve nor univocal. It was strategic, ironic, often messianic. From the Futurists’ eroticization of engines to Constructivist visions of social reengineering, the avant-garde absorbed technology not as passive infrastructure but as a mode of being – a way of thinking, seeing, and producing. The mechanical was no longer merely instrumental; it became symbolic, even sacred. The factory displaced the cathedral and the diagram supplanted the allegory. The importance of this embrace lies in the way it recast the very function of art. The artist was no longer a romantic visionary exiled from history, but an engineer of perception, a constructor of alternative realities, a designer of collective futures. Art became procedural, recursive, and open-ended – less a monument than a model, less an object than an experiment. The technics of creation took precedence over representation. In appropriating the idioms of science, mathematics, and architecture, the avant-garde enacted a formal revolution that paralleled, and sometimes prefigured, technological change. Yet it also subjected these domains to defamiliarization, subversion, and wonder. The mechanical was aestheticized even as aesthetics were mechanized. This dialectic gave rise to new genres, materials, and media, but also to new subjectivities – hybrid figures of the artist-engineer, the poet-coder, the machinic performer. Technology thus became both a tool and a topos - a means of artistic production and a symbolic terrain on which the contradictions of modernity played out. The Avant-garde did not seek to humanize the machine so much as to machinize the human: to reimagine perception, cognition, and affect in terms of rhythm, precision, and structure. This was not an abandonment of the aesthetic, but its reinvention in technical form.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles)
Published
2026-05-01
Primary Topic
Art, Technology, and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unfinished Modernity and the Idea of the Tékhnē. From Multiple Realities to Fourth Dimension: (East)European Avant-Garde Cases.

Денис Иоффе
Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles)
Art, Technology, and Culture
article

Unfinished Modernity and the Idea of the Tékhnē. From Multiple Realities to Fourth Dimension: (East)European Avant-Garde Cases.

Денис Иоффе
article en

Abstract

The Avant-garde’s turn toward technology was not simply an infatuation with mechanical novelty. It was a metaphysical gambit—a wager that the machine, far from annihilating the aesthetic, might become its crucible. The embrace of technology was, in this sense, a profound act of reorientation: artists and thinkers who had once viewed machinery as the emblem of alienation began to see in it the raw material for a new poetics of the modern. This shift was neither naïve nor univocal. It was strategic, ironic, often messianic. From the Futurists’ eroticization of engines to Constructivist visions of social reengineering, the avant-garde absorbed technology not as passive infrastructure but as a mode of being – a way of thinking, seeing, and producing. The mechanical was no longer merely instrumental; it became symbolic, even sacred. The factory displaced the cathedral and the diagram supplanted the allegory. The importance of this embrace lies in the way it recast the very function of art. The artist was no longer a romantic visionary exiled from history, but an engineer of perception, a constructor of alternative realities, a designer of collective futures. Art became procedural, recursive, and open-ended – less a monument than a model, less an object than an experiment. The technics of creation took precedence over representation. In appropriating the idioms of science, mathematics, and architecture, the avant-garde enacted a formal revolution that paralleled, and sometimes prefigured, technological change. Yet it also subjected these domains to defamiliarization, subversion, and wonder. The mechanical was aestheticized even as aesthetics were mechanized. This dialectic gave rise to new genres, materials, and media, but also to new subjectivities – hybrid figures of the artist-engineer, the poet-coder, the machinic performer. Technology thus became both a tool and a topos - a means of artistic production and a symbolic terrain on which the contradictions of modernity played out. The Avant-garde did not seek to humanize the machine so much as to machinize the human: to reimagine perception, cognition, and affect in terms of rhythm, precision, and structure. This was not an abandonment of the aesthetic, but its reinvention in technical form.

Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Art, Technology, and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.