To enrol or not to enrol: What are the risks in choosing a massive open online course (MOOC)?

Abstract Massive open online courses (MOOCs) offer a unique opportunity for lifelong learning by providing a learning platform for a large and diverse audience. Although their popularity is still growing, industry experts had anticipated a higher level of acceptance than has actually occurred. One possible reason for the slower-than-expected growth is the perceived risk to learners. This study examines the factors influencing MOOC adoption based on perceived risk theory. Using survey-based quantitative analysis (with responses from 300 university students), the authors define four main dimensions of perceived risk: value, non-financial investment, social risk and security. Their findings show that uncertainty about the value offered by MOOCs is one of the most important dimensions in assessing risk. The second most important risk factor is learners’ non-financial investment. The main sources of this investment, time and effort, are finite for learners and thus represent a critical dimension in the educational context of risk research. Social factors also have an impact on perceived risk, albeit to a lesser extent, while security factors do not. The results suggest that MOOC developers and providers play an important role in reducing risks associated with delivery uncertainty and in optimising learners’ time and energy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Education
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-025-10170-5
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To enrol or not to enrol: What are the risks in choosing a massive open online course (MOOC)?

Zsófia Kenesei, Gábor Pörzse
International Review of Education
Online Learning and Analytics
article

To enrol or not to enrol: What are the risks in choosing a massive open online course (MOOC)?

Zsófia Kenesei, Gábor Pörzse
article en

Abstract

Abstract Massive open online courses (MOOCs) offer a unique opportunity for lifelong learning by providing a learning platform for a large and diverse audience. Although their popularity is still growing, industry experts had anticipated a higher level of acceptance than has actually occurred. One possible reason for the slower-than-expected growth is the perceived risk to learners. This study examines the factors influencing MOOC adoption based on perceived risk theory. Using survey-based quantitative analysis (with responses from 300 university students), the authors define four main dimensions of perceived risk: value, non-financial investment, social risk and security. Their findings show that uncertainty about the value offered by MOOCs is one of the most important dimensions in assessing risk. The second most important risk factor is learners’ non-financial investment. The main sources of this investment, time and effort, are finite for learners and thus represent a critical dimension in the educational context of risk research. Social factors also have an impact on perceived risk, albeit to a lesser extent, while security factors do not. The results suggest that MOOC developers and providers play an important role in reducing risks associated with delivery uncertainty and in optimising learners’ time and energy.

International Review of Education
Semmelweis University (HU), Corvinus University of Budapest (HU)
Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.