Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Women With Overt Diabetes at Diagnosis Versus Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Women diagnosed with hyperglycemia in pregnancy represent a heterogeneous population. A distinct subgroup, those with overt diabetes or diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) diagnosed at the first prenatal visit or during pregnancy (fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5%), may carry a significantly higher long-term cardiometabolic risk than women with standard gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to review and meta-analyse the risk of postpartum type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), metabolic syndrome (MetS), and cardiovascular risk markers in women diagnosed with overt diabetes during pregnancy compared to those with GDM. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to December 2025. Observational studies comparing maternal postpartum cardiometabolic outcomes between women with overt diabetes (excluding known pre-existing diabetes) and women with GDM were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and JBI checklists. Random-effects meta-analysis with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was performed. The primary outcome was incident postpartum T2DM. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Seven studies (n = 3,293 participants) from Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Europe met the inclusion criteria. Women with overt diabetes had a substantially increased risk of developing postpartum T2DM compared to women with GDM (pooled odds ratio (OR) 10.69; 95% CI 5.32-21.48; <i>p</i> < 0.001; high certainty evidence). They exhibited a more than two-fold higher risk of MetS (OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.49-3.53; <i>p</i> < 0.001; moderate certainty evidence). Mean BMI was numerically higher in the overt diabetes group (mean difference 1.60 kg/m ²), though not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.07). Heterogeneity was negligible for the primary outcome (I<sup>2</sup> = 0.5%). These findings support the urgent need for stratified postpartum surveillance and intensive, early preventive interventions for women with overt diabetes, rather than managing them under general GDM protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.102898
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Women With Overt Diabetes at Diagnosis Versus Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Khadeeja Ibrahim, Mohammed Samy Tayb, Nosaiba Ali, Zainab Mohammed Takroni et al.
Cureus
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Women With Overt Diabetes at Diagnosis Versus Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Khadeeja Ibrahim, Mohammed Samy Tayb, Nosaiba Ali, Zainab Mohammed Takroni, Elaf Abu-aba, Khadija Alkahtani, Lian A Zeyad, Muna M Mahjoub, Hanaa M Abd Rabeh, Yosra M Sahl, Shorooq M Alhousawi, Mohammad A Alteibawi, Hadeel Almuzayen, Manhal H Idris, Shatha Alqahtani
article en

Abstract

Women diagnosed with hyperglycemia in pregnancy represent a heterogeneous population. A distinct subgroup, those with overt diabetes or diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) diagnosed at the first prenatal visit or during pregnancy (fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5%), may carry a significantly higher long-term cardiometabolic risk than women with standard gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to review and meta-analyse the risk of postpartum type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), metabolic syndrome (MetS), and cardiovascular risk markers in women diagnosed with overt diabetes during pregnancy compared to those with GDM. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to December 2025. Observational studies comparing maternal postpartum cardiometabolic outcomes between women with overt diabetes (excluding known pre-existing diabetes) and women with GDM were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and JBI checklists. Random-effects meta-analysis with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was performed. The primary outcome was incident postpartum T2DM. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Seven studies (n = 3,293 participants) from Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Europe met the inclusion criteria. Women with overt diabetes had a substantially increased risk of developing postpartum T2DM compared to women with GDM (pooled odds ratio (OR) 10.69; 95% CI 5.32-21.48; <i>p</i> < 0.001; high certainty evidence). They exhibited a more than two-fold higher risk of MetS (OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.49-3.53; <i>p</i> < 0.001; moderate certainty evidence). Mean BMI was numerically higher in the overt diabetes group (mean difference 1.60 kg/m ²), though not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.07). Heterogeneity was negligible for the primary outcome (I<sup>2</sup> = 0.5%). These findings support the urgent need for stratified postpartum surveillance and intensive, early preventive interventions for women with overt diabetes, rather than managing them under general GDM protocols.

CureusVol. 18(2)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Taibah University (SA), Jahra Hospital (KW), King Saud University (SA), University of Jeddah (SA), Maternity and Children's Hospital (SA), Ministry of Health (JO), Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization (KW), King Fahad Hospital Jeddah (SA), Minia University Hospital (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.