Efficacy of Lebrikizumab in Patients With Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Would be Eligible for Treatment Based on the South Korean Reimbursement Criteria

ABSTRACT Background Lebrikizumab is approved to treat patients with moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives This study evaluated the 16‐week efficacy outcomes of lebrikizumab in adults and adolescents with severe AD in ADvocate trials who would be eligible for treatment based on South Korean reimbursement‐like criteria. Methods This was a post‐hoc analysis of pooled data from ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967). Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive lebrikizumab or placebo every 2 weeks. Two non‐mutually exclusive subgroups were selected based on South Korean reimbursement‐like criteria: Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 23, AD duration ≥ 3 years, and previous use of any systemic treatment (ST subgroup) or previous treatment with cyclosporine or methotrexate (CM subgroup). Week‐16 outcomes were Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA [0,1]) with ≥ 2‐point improvement, ≥ 50%/75%/90% improvement in EASI score (EASI 50/75/90), Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≥ 4‐point improvement, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≥ 4‐point improvement. Response rates to lebrikizumab and placebo were analysed using Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests. Common risk differences and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Results The ST subgroup included 322 patients, and the CM subgroup included 111 patients. More lebrikizumab‐treated than placebo‐treated patients achieved outcome responses. Percentage differences in favour of lebrikizumab ( p < 0.01) were: IGA (0,1): ST = 25.7% (18.2%–33.1%), CM = 20.8% (7.9%–33.7%); EASI 50: ST = 42.7% (32.5%–52.9%), CM = 36.9% (19.8%–54.0%); EASI 75: ST = 40.2% (31.4%–49.1%), CM = 33.3% (19.1%–47.5%); EASI 90: ST = 27.4% (20.3%–34.5%), CM = 22.1% (11.3%–32.8%); Pruritus NRS ≥ 4‐point improvement: ST = 34.7% (26.7%–42.7%), CM = 26.7% (14.9%–38.4%); and DLQI ≥ 4‐point improvement: ST = 44.2% (33.2%–55.2%), CM = 39.5% (20.2%–58.8%). Conclusions In this post‐hoc, exploratory subgroup analysis, lebrikizumab improved AD skin and pruritus at week 16 in adults and adolescents who would be eligible for treatment based on South Korean reimbursement‐like criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JEADV Clinical Practice
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.70271
Primary Topic
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Lebrikizumab in Patients With Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Would be Eligible for Treatment Based on the South Korean Reimbursement Criteria

Martín Dossenbach, K. Ng, J Lee, Y. W. Lee et al.
JEADV Clinical Practice
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
article

Efficacy of Lebrikizumab in Patients With Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Would be Eligible for Treatment Based on the South Korean Reimbursement Criteria

Martín Dossenbach, K. Ng, J Lee, Y. W. Lee, Chong Hyun Won, Min Hong, Jinglin Zhong, Chun Wook Park, Sang Wook Son, Jiyoung Ahn, Sang Hyun Cho, Joo Yeon Ko
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Lebrikizumab is approved to treat patients with moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives This study evaluated the 16‐week efficacy outcomes of lebrikizumab in adults and adolescents with severe AD in ADvocate trials who would be eligible for treatment based on South Korean reimbursement‐like criteria. Methods This was a post‐hoc analysis of pooled data from ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967). Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive lebrikizumab or placebo every 2 weeks. Two non‐mutually exclusive subgroups were selected based on South Korean reimbursement‐like criteria: Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 23, AD duration ≥ 3 years, and previous use of any systemic treatment (ST subgroup) or previous treatment with cyclosporine or methotrexate (CM subgroup). Week‐16 outcomes were Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA [0,1]) with ≥ 2‐point improvement, ≥ 50%/75%/90% improvement in EASI score (EASI 50/75/90), Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≥ 4‐point improvement, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≥ 4‐point improvement. Response rates to lebrikizumab and placebo were analysed using Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests. Common risk differences and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Results The ST subgroup included 322 patients, and the CM subgroup included 111 patients. More lebrikizumab‐treated than placebo‐treated patients achieved outcome responses. Percentage differences in favour of lebrikizumab ( p < 0.01) were: IGA (0,1): ST = 25.7% (18.2%–33.1%), CM = 20.8% (7.9%–33.7%); EASI 50: ST = 42.7% (32.5%–52.9%), CM = 36.9% (19.8%–54.0%); EASI 75: ST = 40.2% (31.4%–49.1%), CM = 33.3% (19.1%–47.5%); EASI 90: ST = 27.4% (20.3%–34.5%), CM = 22.1% (11.3%–32.8%); Pruritus NRS ≥ 4‐point improvement: ST = 34.7% (26.7%–42.7%), CM = 26.7% (14.9%–38.4%); and DLQI ≥ 4‐point improvement: ST = 44.2% (33.2%–55.2%), CM = 39.5% (20.2%–58.8%). Conclusions In this post‐hoc, exploratory subgroup analysis, lebrikizumab improved AD skin and pruritus at week 16 in adults and adolescents who would be eligible for treatment based on South Korean reimbursement‐like criteria.

JEADV Clinical Practice
Ulsan College (KR), Eli Lilly (United States) (US), Korea University (KR), Konkuk University (KR), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), IQVIA (United States) (US), National Medical Center (KR), Hanyang University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.