A framework for assessing the trustworthiness of scientific research findings

Vigorous debate has erupted over the trustworthiness of scientific research findings in a number of domains. The question "what makes research findings trustworthy?" elicits different answers depending on whether the emphasis is on research integrity and ethics, research methods, transparency, inclusion, assessment and peer review, or scholarly communication. Each provides partial insight. We offer a systems approach that focuses on whether the research is accountable, evaluable, well-formulated, has been evaluated, controls for bias, reduces error, and whether the claims are warranted by the evidence. We tie each of these components to measurable indicators of trustworthiness for evaluating the research itself, the researchers conducting the research, and the organizations supporting the research. Our goals are to offer a framework that can be applied across methods, approaches, and disciplines and to foster innovation in development of trustworthiness indicators. Developing valid indicators will improve the conduct and assessment of research and, ultimately, public understanding and trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2536736123
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for assessing the trustworthiness of scientific research findings

Marcia McNutt, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, A. Beau Nielsen, David B. Allison et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Academic integrity and plagiarism
25.65
article

A framework for assessing the trustworthiness of scientific research findings

Marcia McNutt, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, A. Beau Nielsen, David B. Allison, Susan M. Wolf, Brian A. Nosek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Vigorous debate has erupted over the trustworthiness of scientific research findings in a number of domains. The question "what makes research findings trustworthy?" elicits different answers depending on whether the emphasis is on research integrity and ethics, research methods, transparency, inclusion, assessment and peer review, or scholarly communication. Each provides partial insight. We offer a systems approach that focuses on whether the research is accountable, evaluable, well-formulated, has been evaluated, controls for bias, reduces error, and whether the claims are warranted by the evidence. We tie each of these components to measurable indicators of trustworthiness for evaluating the research itself, the researchers conducting the research, and the organizations supporting the research. Our goals are to offer a framework that can be applied across methods, approaches, and disciplines and to foster innovation in development of trustworthiness indicators. Developing valid indicators will improve the conduct and assessment of research and, ultimately, public understanding and trust.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(6)
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US), Center for Open Science (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Health & Life (Taiwan) (TW), University of Virginia (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
25.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.