Unpacking the multidimensional relationship between crisis and policy change: a systematic review

Abstract This article presents a systematic review of how the relationship between crisis and policy change is conceptualized, operationalized, and analyzed in public policy literature. We analyze five dimensions: crisis definitions, the causal mechanisms linking crises to change, the types and intensities of change, the political and ideological effects, and the modes of governing crises. The review reveals persistent conceptual ambiguity, limited attention to political dynamics, and a dominant focus on ideational mechanisms. Furthermore, by adopting a typology of the politics of governing crises as an analytical tool, the study also identifies recurring patterns across mechanisms, political strategies, and outputs. This theory-informed review offers a foundation for systematic, comparative research on crisis-driven policy change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy and Society
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puaf041
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking the multidimensional relationship between crisis and policy change: a systematic review

Laura Mastroianni, Stefania Profeti, Giliberto Capano
1 citations
Policy and Society
Policy Transfer and Learning
8.52
article

Unpacking the multidimensional relationship between crisis and policy change: a systematic review

Laura Mastroianni, Stefania Profeti, Giliberto Capano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article presents a systematic review of how the relationship between crisis and policy change is conceptualized, operationalized, and analyzed in public policy literature. We analyze five dimensions: crisis definitions, the causal mechanisms linking crises to change, the types and intensities of change, the political and ideological effects, and the modes of governing crises. The review reveals persistent conceptual ambiguity, limited attention to political dynamics, and a dominant focus on ideational mechanisms. Furthermore, by adopting a typology of the politics of governing crises as an analytical tool, the study also identifies recurring patterns across mechanisms, political strategies, and outputs. This theory-informed review offers a foundation for systematic, comparative research on crisis-driven policy change.

Policy and SocietyVol. 45(1)
University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Policy Transfer and Learning
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.