Beyond Stochastic Intelligence: Deterministic Constraints for Verifiable Reasoning Systems

his paper examines a structural limitation in modern large language models: they cannot guarantee stability, replayability, or verifiable correctness because reasoning is driven by stochastic inference at the boundary where decisions are formed. Many familiar failure modes such as hallucination, interpretation drift, and non reproducibility are not problems of tuning or scale. They are architectural. This paper argues that these failures arise from systems that re infer task meaning and reasoning state on each run. In response, it outlines a deterministic systems framework where reasoning is constrained by externally governed state, a fixed task ontology, and execution paths that can be audited and replayed. The work is conceptual and architectural in nature. It does not introduce a new model. Instead, it defines a set of system level constraints under which reasoning systems can be made verifiable, explainable, and appropriate for high stakes use. This manuscript is intended as a foundational position paper and is paired with ongoing empirical and implementation work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18475059
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Stochastic Intelligence: Deterministic Constraints for Verifiable Reasoning Systems

Armonti Du-Bose-Hill
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
article

Beyond Stochastic Intelligence: Deterministic Constraints for Verifiable Reasoning Systems

Armonti Du-Bose-Hill
article en

Abstract

his paper examines a structural limitation in modern large language models: they cannot guarantee stability, replayability, or verifiable correctness because reasoning is driven by stochastic inference at the boundary where decisions are formed. Many familiar failure modes such as hallucination, interpretation drift, and non reproducibility are not problems of tuning or scale. They are architectural. This paper argues that these failures arise from systems that re infer task meaning and reasoning state on each run. In response, it outlines a deterministic systems framework where reasoning is constrained by externally governed state, a fixed task ontology, and execution paths that can be audited and replayed. The work is conceptual and architectural in nature. It does not introduce a new model. Instead, it defines a set of system level constraints under which reasoning systems can be made verifiable, explainable, and appropriate for high stakes use. This manuscript is intended as a foundational position paper and is paired with ongoing empirical and implementation work.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
SC Solutions (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.