Reclaiming security and infrastructures: the emergence and discontents of “Safe City” projects from Jerusalem to Bishkek

Abstract This article examines the role of infrastructure in so-called “Safe” and “Smart City” projects. It shows how these projects address security issues selectively and can become active drivers of urban insecurity processes. We explain this with the fact that, while infrastructures are seen as integral to the security of some, they often also undermine the safety of others, a process which we conceptualize as “infrastructured insecurity.” Providing empirical analyses from Jerusalem (Israel/Occupied Palestinian territories) and Bishkek (Kyrgyz Republic) the article illustrates how “infrastructured insecurity” exists despite, or emerges directly from, “Smart” and “Safe City” projects, but also how communities challenge the exclusionary forms of security those projects imply. Infrastructures therefore prompt us to reframe and rethink different understandings and practices of security, including the creation and reclaiming of security, in and beyond the urban.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Security Dialogue
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/secdia/xhaf001
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reclaiming security and infrastructures: the emergence and discontents of “Safe City” projects from Jerusalem to Bishkek

Philipp Lottholz, Amina Nolte
Security Dialogue
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

Reclaiming security and infrastructures: the emergence and discontents of “Safe City” projects from Jerusalem to Bishkek

Philipp Lottholz, Amina Nolte
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the role of infrastructure in so-called “Safe” and “Smart City” projects. It shows how these projects address security issues selectively and can become active drivers of urban insecurity processes. We explain this with the fact that, while infrastructures are seen as integral to the security of some, they often also undermine the safety of others, a process which we conceptualize as “infrastructured insecurity.” Providing empirical analyses from Jerusalem (Israel/Occupied Palestinian territories) and Bishkek (Kyrgyz Republic) the article illustrates how “infrastructured insecurity” exists despite, or emerges directly from, “Smart” and “Safe City” projects, but also how communities challenge the exclusionary forms of security those projects imply. Infrastructures therefore prompt us to reframe and rethink different understandings and practices of security, including the creation and reclaiming of security, in and beyond the urban.

Security Dialogue
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Chemical Dynamics (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reclaiming security and infrastructures: the emergence and discontents of “Safe City” projects from Jerusalem to Bishkek — Philipp Lottholz, Amina Nolte · Security Dialogue (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS