Advancements in intratumoral therapies for liver tumors

Liver tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), and liver-dominant metastases, remain associated with high mortality despite advances in systemic therapy. Intratumoral therapies have emerged as a promising strategy to achieve high local drug concentrations, modulate the tumor microenvironment, and enhance systemic anti-tumor immunity while limiting systemic toxicity. Although intratumoral approaches have demonstrated clinical success in melanoma, their translation to liver malignancies presents unique biological, immunologic, and technical challenges. This review synthesizes clinical evidence from the past decade evaluating intratumoral therapies for primary and metastatic liver tumors, including oncolytic viruses, cell-based immunotherapies, <i>in situ</i> immunomodulators, intratumoral chemotherapy, and combination strategies with locoregional or systemic treatments. Across early- and late-phase trials, intratumoral therapies have produced heterogeneous outcomes, ranging from tumor necrosis and disease stabilization to occasional systemic (abscopal) responses, while several large studies have failed to demonstrate survival benefit. These mixed results reflect the liver's highly tolerogenic immune microenvironment, characterized by abundant myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells, and abnormal vasculature that limit immune activation and drug distribution. We highlight key determinants of efficacy, including tumor biology, delivery technique, dosing strategy, and rational therapeutic combinations. Technical considerations such as image-guided injection, intratumoral pressure, and standardization of administration are reviewed, alongside emerging biomarkers, including immune, molecular, and imaging-based markers, that may enable improved patient selection. Overall, current evidence suggests that intratumoral therapies alone are rarely sufficient for liver tumors but may provide meaningful benefit when integrated into multimodal regimens. Future progress will depend on optimized combination strategies, standardized delivery approaches, and validated biomarkers to support personalized application in liver cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1726128
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancements in intratumoral therapies for liver tumors

Sramek Jj, Cutler Nr, Steven S. Raman, Sidharth R. Anand et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Advancements in intratumoral therapies for liver tumors

Sramek Jj, Cutler Nr, Steven S. Raman, Sidharth R. Anand, David Lu, Jason Chiang, J. Randolph Hecht, Richard S. Finn
article en

Abstract

Liver tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), and liver-dominant metastases, remain associated with high mortality despite advances in systemic therapy. Intratumoral therapies have emerged as a promising strategy to achieve high local drug concentrations, modulate the tumor microenvironment, and enhance systemic anti-tumor immunity while limiting systemic toxicity. Although intratumoral approaches have demonstrated clinical success in melanoma, their translation to liver malignancies presents unique biological, immunologic, and technical challenges. This review synthesizes clinical evidence from the past decade evaluating intratumoral therapies for primary and metastatic liver tumors, including oncolytic viruses, cell-based immunotherapies, <i>in situ</i> immunomodulators, intratumoral chemotherapy, and combination strategies with locoregional or systemic treatments. Across early- and late-phase trials, intratumoral therapies have produced heterogeneous outcomes, ranging from tumor necrosis and disease stabilization to occasional systemic (abscopal) responses, while several large studies have failed to demonstrate survival benefit. These mixed results reflect the liver's highly tolerogenic immune microenvironment, characterized by abundant myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells, and abnormal vasculature that limit immune activation and drug distribution. We highlight key determinants of efficacy, including tumor biology, delivery technique, dosing strategy, and rational therapeutic combinations. Technical considerations such as image-guided injection, intratumoral pressure, and standardization of administration are reviewed, alongside emerging biomarkers, including immune, molecular, and imaging-based markers, that may enable improved patient selection. Overall, current evidence suggests that intratumoral therapies alone are rarely sufficient for liver tumors but may provide meaningful benefit when integrated into multimodal regimens. Future progress will depend on optimized combination strategies, standardized delivery approaches, and validated biomarkers to support personalized application in liver cancer.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
University of California, Los Angeles (US), UCLA Health (US), MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB), Olive View-UCLA Medical Center (US), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US), Universität Trier (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.