Quality of Decision-Making Processes in Teams: An Analysis of the Effects of Supportive Organizational Culture, Perceived Decision Relevance and a Potential Use of AI

Abstract This study investigates the quality of decision-making processes in corporate teams – a construct that is often overlooked or insufficiently operationalized in existing research. Based on the comprehensive framework by Spetzler et al. (2016), this research systematically assesses process quality, examines its influence on perceived decision-making success and identifies key factors that shape the decision-making processes quality in the context of team decision-making. A quantitative survey was conducted among 461 employees in Germany who regularly participate in team decision-making. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the impact of a supportive organizational culture and the perceived relevance of the team decision on decision process quality, and subsequently the impact of this quality on the perceived success. Results show that both factors significantly enhance process quality, which in turn strongly predicts the perceived success. Additionally, the study explores how artificial intelligence (AI) as decision support influences process quality. A group comparison between employees with and without experience in AI-supported team decision-making and regression analyses reveal that actual use of AI is associated with higher trust in intelligent systems and a more favorable assessment of process quality. Trust in AI significantly predicts process quality across both groups. These findings contribute to the understanding of the determinants of decision-making quality and the emerging role of AI in organizational decision contexts. From a practical perspective, organizations can improve decision-making processes by providing sufficient resources and communicating the relevance of decisions. AI should be explored by users beforehand and fears addressed at an early stage to enhance trust and thus process quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group Decision and Negotiation
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-026-09966-z
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Decision-Making Processes in Teams: An Analysis of the Effects of Supportive Organizational Culture, Perceived Decision Relevance and a Potential Use of AI

Susanne Mütze‐Niewöhner, Verena Nitsch, Marisa Schirmer, Rüdiger von Nitzsch et al.
Group Decision and Negotiation
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Quality of Decision-Making Processes in Teams: An Analysis of the Effects of Supportive Organizational Culture, Perceived Decision Relevance and a Potential Use of AI

Susanne Mütze‐Niewöhner, Verena Nitsch, Marisa Schirmer, Rüdiger von Nitzsch, Selina Fußwinkel
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the quality of decision-making processes in corporate teams – a construct that is often overlooked or insufficiently operationalized in existing research. Based on the comprehensive framework by Spetzler et al. (2016), this research systematically assesses process quality, examines its influence on perceived decision-making success and identifies key factors that shape the decision-making processes quality in the context of team decision-making. A quantitative survey was conducted among 461 employees in Germany who regularly participate in team decision-making. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the impact of a supportive organizational culture and the perceived relevance of the team decision on decision process quality, and subsequently the impact of this quality on the perceived success. Results show that both factors significantly enhance process quality, which in turn strongly predicts the perceived success. Additionally, the study explores how artificial intelligence (AI) as decision support influences process quality. A group comparison between employees with and without experience in AI-supported team decision-making and regression analyses reveal that actual use of AI is associated with higher trust in intelligent systems and a more favorable assessment of process quality. Trust in AI significantly predicts process quality across both groups. These findings contribute to the understanding of the determinants of decision-making quality and the emerging role of AI in organizational decision contexts. From a practical perspective, organizations can improve decision-making processes by providing sufficient resources and communicating the relevance of decisions. AI should be explored by users beforehand and fears addressed at an early stage to enhance trust and thus process quality.

Group Decision and NegotiationVol. 35(1)
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quality of Decision-Making Processes in Teams: An Analysis of the Effects of Supportive Organizational Culture, Perceived Decision Relevance and a Potential Use of AI — Susanne Mütze‐Niewöhner, Verena Nitsch, et al. · Group Decision and Negotiation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS