Quantifying and benchmarking drinking water treatment facilities in 5 geographical regions in New Jersey, USA using energy and carbon intensity metrics

• A data collection and organization methodology is proposed for benchmarking drinking water facilities across five regions in New Jersey. • Energy and carbon intensity metrics are calculated to compare regional performance. • The influences of the population density, terrain and applied treatment technologies on energy consumption are explored. Energy use in drinking water system varies significantly across utilities due to differences in operating conditions, and system configuration, posing challenges for consistent energy benchmarking. In this study, we present data collection, alignment and benchmarking approach based on a long-term operational data set from a water utility company operated in five geographical regions in New Jersey. The framework enabled quantification and comparison of total energy consumption and water production, across raw water, treatment and finished water facilities. The total energy and carbon intensity metrics were calculated using the aligned dataset supporting the comparative benchmarking approach.. Energy and carbon intensities were calculated for all regions combined, by region, and by specific function of drinking water facilities, resulting in overall averages of 0.7 kWh/m³ and 0.24 kg CO 2 e/m 3 , respectively. Additionally, this study highlights that factors such as topography, applied treatment technologies and the spatial distribution of water consumers are positively correlated with energy requirements for pumping and treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Nexus
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2026.100645
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying and benchmarking drinking water treatment facilities in 5 geographical regions in New Jersey, USA using energy and carbon intensity metrics

William Riddell, Amna A.M. Bashir, Jagadish Torlapati
Energy Nexus
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
article

Quantifying and benchmarking drinking water treatment facilities in 5 geographical regions in New Jersey, USA using energy and carbon intensity metrics

William Riddell, Amna A.M. Bashir, Jagadish Torlapati
article en

Abstract

• A data collection and organization methodology is proposed for benchmarking drinking water facilities across five regions in New Jersey. • Energy and carbon intensity metrics are calculated to compare regional performance. • The influences of the population density, terrain and applied treatment technologies on energy consumption are explored. Energy use in drinking water system varies significantly across utilities due to differences in operating conditions, and system configuration, posing challenges for consistent energy benchmarking. In this study, we present data collection, alignment and benchmarking approach based on a long-term operational data set from a water utility company operated in five geographical regions in New Jersey. The framework enabled quantification and comparison of total energy consumption and water production, across raw water, treatment and finished water facilities. The total energy and carbon intensity metrics were calculated using the aligned dataset supporting the comparative benchmarking approach.. Energy and carbon intensities were calculated for all regions combined, by region, and by specific function of drinking water facilities, resulting in overall averages of 0.7 kWh/m³ and 0.24 kg CO 2 e/m 3 , respectively. Additionally, this study highlights that factors such as topography, applied treatment technologies and the spatial distribution of water consumers are positively correlated with energy requirements for pumping and treatment.

Energy NexusVol. 21
Rowan University (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.