Inter-Comparison of Deep Learning Models for Flood Forecasting in Ethiopia’s Upper Awash Basin

Flood events driven by climate variability and change pose significant risks for socio-economic activities in the Awash Basin, necessitating advanced forecasting tools. This study benchmarks five deep learning (DL) architectures, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), and a Hybrid CNN–LSTM, for daily discharge forecasting for the Hombole catchment in the Upper Awash Basin (UAB) using 40 years of hydrometeorological observations (1981–2020). Rainfall, lagged discharge, and seasonal indicators were used as predictors. Model performance was evaluated against two baseline approaches, a conceptual HBV rainfall–runoff model as well as a climatology, using standard and hydrological metrics. Of the two baselines (climatology and HBV), the climatology showed limited skill with large bias and negative NSE, whereas the HBV model achieved moderate skill (NSE = 0.64 and KGE = 0.82). In contrast, all DL models substantially improved predictive performance, achieving test NSE values above 0.83 and low overall bias. Among them, the Hybrid CNN–LSTM provided the most balanced performance, combining local temporal feature extraction with long-term memory and yielding stable efficiency (NSE ≈ 0.84, KGE ≈ 0.90, and PBIAS ≈ −2%) across flow regimes. The LSTM and GRU models performed comparably, offering strong temporal learning and robust daily predictions, while BiLSTM improved flood timing through bidirectional sequence modeling. The CNN captured short-term variability effectively but showed weaker representation of extreme peaks. Analysis of peak-flow metrics revealed systematic underestimation of extreme discharge magnitudes across all models. However, a post-processing flow-regime classification based on discharge quantiles demonstrated high extreme-event detection skill, with deep learning models exceeding 89% accuracy in identifying extreme-flow occurrences on the test set. These findings indicate that, while magnitude errors remain for rare floods, DL models reliably discriminate flood regimes relevant for early warning. Overall, the results show that deep learning models provide clear improvements over climatology and conceptual baselines for daily streamflow forecasting in the UAB, while highlighting remaining challenges in peak-flow magnitude prediction. The study indicates promising results for the integration of deep learning methods into flood early-warning workflows; however, these results could be further improved by adopting a probabilistic forecasting framework that accounts for model uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18030397
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-Comparison of Deep Learning Models for Flood Forecasting in Ethiopia’s Upper Awash Basin

Addisu Gezahegn Semie, G. T. Diro, Girma Moges Mengistu, Emiola Gbobaniyi et al.
Water
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Inter-Comparison of Deep Learning Models for Flood Forecasting in Ethiopia’s Upper Awash Basin

Addisu Gezahegn Semie, G. T. Diro, Girma Moges Mengistu, Emiola Gbobaniyi, Yonas Mersha, Natei Ermias Benti
article en

Abstract

Flood events driven by climate variability and change pose significant risks for socio-economic activities in the Awash Basin, necessitating advanced forecasting tools. This study benchmarks five deep learning (DL) architectures, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), and a Hybrid CNN–LSTM, for daily discharge forecasting for the Hombole catchment in the Upper Awash Basin (UAB) using 40 years of hydrometeorological observations (1981–2020). Rainfall, lagged discharge, and seasonal indicators were used as predictors. Model performance was evaluated against two baseline approaches, a conceptual HBV rainfall–runoff model as well as a climatology, using standard and hydrological metrics. Of the two baselines (climatology and HBV), the climatology showed limited skill with large bias and negative NSE, whereas the HBV model achieved moderate skill (NSE = 0.64 and KGE = 0.82). In contrast, all DL models substantially improved predictive performance, achieving test NSE values above 0.83 and low overall bias. Among them, the Hybrid CNN–LSTM provided the most balanced performance, combining local temporal feature extraction with long-term memory and yielding stable efficiency (NSE ≈ 0.84, KGE ≈ 0.90, and PBIAS ≈ −2%) across flow regimes. The LSTM and GRU models performed comparably, offering strong temporal learning and robust daily predictions, while BiLSTM improved flood timing through bidirectional sequence modeling. The CNN captured short-term variability effectively but showed weaker representation of extreme peaks. Analysis of peak-flow metrics revealed systematic underestimation of extreme discharge magnitudes across all models. However, a post-processing flow-regime classification based on discharge quantiles demonstrated high extreme-event detection skill, with deep learning models exceeding 89% accuracy in identifying extreme-flow occurrences on the test set. These findings indicate that, while magnitude errors remain for rare floods, DL models reliably discriminate flood regimes relevant for early warning. Overall, the results show that deep learning models provide clear improvements over climatology and conceptual baselines for daily streamflow forecasting in the UAB, while highlighting remaining challenges in peak-flow magnitude prediction. The study indicates promising results for the integration of deep learning methods into flood early-warning workflows; however, these results could be further improved by adopting a probabilistic forecasting framework that accounts for model uncertainty.

WaterVol. 18(3)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE), Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Addis Ababa University (ET), Université de Montréal (CA), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.