The ‘laboratory school’ as a traded service: travelling practices of professional learning

Transnational markets in professional learning are expanding rapidly. The commodification of standardised pedagogical models within these markets raises concerns about teachers’ capacity to exercise contextually responsive professional judgement. Drawing on policy mobilities scholarship, this comparative case study examines a university-led ‘laboratory school’ network spanning thirty-four public and private schools in England, the United States, China and India (2020-2022). The signature practice of collaborative peer review using instructional rounds was promoted as a transferable model across diverse settings. Network mapping documented reach and engagement, while eighteen semi-structured leader interviews explored the rationale for network entry, the conditions mediating enactment, and the locally-generated theories of action that emerged. The findings demonstrate how the same practice was differentially understood across settings, complicating assumptions about pedagogical practices travelling intact across borders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2026.2616821
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ‘laboratory school’ as a traded service: travelling practices of professional learning

Moira Hulme
Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

The ‘laboratory school’ as a traded service: travelling practices of professional learning

Moira Hulme
article en

Abstract

Transnational markets in professional learning are expanding rapidly. The commodification of standardised pedagogical models within these markets raises concerns about teachers’ capacity to exercise contextually responsive professional judgement. Drawing on policy mobilities scholarship, this comparative case study examines a university-led ‘laboratory school’ network spanning thirty-four public and private schools in England, the United States, China and India (2020-2022). The signature practice of collaborative peer review using instructional rounds was promoted as a transferable model across diverse settings. Network mapping documented reach and engagement, while eighteen semi-structured leader interviews explored the rationale for network entry, the conditions mediating enactment, and the locally-generated theories of action that emerged. The findings demonstrate how the same practice was differentially understood across settings, complicating assumptions about pedagogical practices travelling intact across borders.

Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education
University of the West of Scotland (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.