Coping and Caregiving Experiences Among Siblings of Individuals with Severe Mental Disorders

<b>Background/Objective:</b> Informal caregiving for individuals with severe mental disorders (SMDs) often leads to significant psychological distress. However, the specific coping strategies that determine mental health outcomes among siblings remain poorly understood. This study aimed to analyze the predictive capacity of various coping strategies regarding health, perceived stress, self-esteem, and caregiving experience for siblings. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of siblings of patients with SMDs (<i>N</i> = 60) from mental health service. Self-report measures were used to assess perceived health, perceived stress, self-esteem, coping strategies, and caregiving experience. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed for each dependent variable, controlling for collinearity. <b>Results:</b> The siblings reported a higher mean use of problem-focused coping strategies compared to emotion-focused coping strategies. Regression models were statistically significant for all analyzed variables, except for somatic symptoms. Emotion-focused maladaptive coping (EFMC) strategies emerged as the most consistent and powerful predictor, showing a significant association with positive caregiving appraisal (β = 0.657), depression (β = 0.500), poor health (β = 0.453), negative stress (β = 0.449), social dysfunction (β = 0.429), self-esteem (β = -0.390), and anxiety (β = 0.368). In contrast, problem-focused strategies were largely non-significant, except for an association with positive and negative aspects of caregiving (β<sub>PFMC</sub> = 0.509, β<sub>PFMC</sub> = 0.312, respectively), and positive stress (β<sub>PFAC</sub> = -0.272). <b>Conclusions:</b> These results suggest that while siblings of people with SMDs report a greater use of problem-focused coping strategies, the adoption of EFMC strategies is the most detrimental factor observed, given their negative influence on mental health, self-esteem, and caregiving experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14030388
Primary Topic
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coping and Caregiving Experiences Among Siblings of Individuals with Severe Mental Disorders

Isabel Cristina Botero Salazar, Carolina Reyes-González, Mª Nieves Pérez-Marfil
Healthcare
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
article

Coping and Caregiving Experiences Among Siblings of Individuals with Severe Mental Disorders

Isabel Cristina Botero Salazar, Carolina Reyes-González, Mª Nieves Pérez-Marfil
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objective:</b> Informal caregiving for individuals with severe mental disorders (SMDs) often leads to significant psychological distress. However, the specific coping strategies that determine mental health outcomes among siblings remain poorly understood. This study aimed to analyze the predictive capacity of various coping strategies regarding health, perceived stress, self-esteem, and caregiving experience for siblings. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of siblings of patients with SMDs (<i>N</i> = 60) from mental health service. Self-report measures were used to assess perceived health, perceived stress, self-esteem, coping strategies, and caregiving experience. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed for each dependent variable, controlling for collinearity. <b>Results:</b> The siblings reported a higher mean use of problem-focused coping strategies compared to emotion-focused coping strategies. Regression models were statistically significant for all analyzed variables, except for somatic symptoms. Emotion-focused maladaptive coping (EFMC) strategies emerged as the most consistent and powerful predictor, showing a significant association with positive caregiving appraisal (β = 0.657), depression (β = 0.500), poor health (β = 0.453), negative stress (β = 0.449), social dysfunction (β = 0.429), self-esteem (β = -0.390), and anxiety (β = 0.368). In contrast, problem-focused strategies were largely non-significant, except for an association with positive and negative aspects of caregiving (β<sub>PFMC</sub> = 0.509, β<sub>PFMC</sub> = 0.312, respectively), and positive stress (β<sub>PFAC</sub> = -0.272). <b>Conclusions:</b> These results suggest that while siblings of people with SMDs report a greater use of problem-focused coping strategies, the adoption of EFMC strategies is the most detrimental factor observed, given their negative influence on mental health, self-esteem, and caregiving experience.

HealthcareVol. 14(3)
Universidad de Granada (ES)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.