Research assessment reform as a key part of the ERA Act
The paper, submitted as an input to the ongoing ERA Act consultation, examines persistent challenges in the implementation of research assessment reform across Europe while highlighting concrete and diverse examples of effective practice.Building on these insights, it recommends that the ERA Act should (i) explicitly enshrine the principles of responsible, qualitative, and open research assessment; (ii) establish a European Research Assessment Observatory to monitor implementation, support mutual learning, and align ongoing initiatives; (iii) invest in a dedicated European initiative, (iv) propose an ERA wide national system of incentives; (v) systematize training for evaluators, panels and the stakeholders involved; (vi) ensure that all voices are included in the discussion and (vii) develop interoperable technical infrastructure that prioritises consistent, high-quality, and broad-ranging data. This document has been developedby a number of individuals interested in open science in their professional and personal capacity ("Amici Scientiae Apertae").
Authors
- Cem Birol (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-6350)
- Daniel Spichtinger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9601-8592)
- Liise Lehtsalu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6894-3377)
- Jan Andersen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3750-0960)
- Simon Kerridge
- Lindsay Dowling
- John Donovan
- Nuria Benitez Monforte
- Ragnar Lie
- Inês Rosa
- Eva Casamitjana-Martinez
Institutions
- Yeditepe University (TR)
- Koç University (TR)
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
- Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft (AT)
- Escola Superior de Música de Catalunya (ES)
- RED Consulting (Norway) (NO)
- Alliance Data (United States) (US)
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES)
- Oldham Council (GB)
- Centro de Estudios Científicos (CL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-01-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18324786
- Primary Topic
- International Science and Diplomacy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00