Pesticide impacts on honey bee foraging behaviour: a field-relevant scoping review

Abstract Honey bees ( Apis spp.) play a crucial role in agricultural productivity and ecosystem functioning through pollination. However, their foraging behaviour is increasingly affected by pesticide exposure, including insecticides, acaricides, fungicides, and herbicides. Reported effects range from adverse to negligible or even stimulatory, depending on the compound, dose, and experimental design. To support more ecologically realistic risk assessments, we conducted a targeted scoping review of 26 studies examining pesticide impacts on honey bee foraging under semi-field and field-realistic conditions. These studies were evaluated based on pesticide type, exposure route and duration, Apis species, foraging type (nectar vs. pollen), behavioural endpoint, level of observation (individual vs. colony), and proposed mechanisms. Our synthesis reveals a pronounced research bias toward neonicotinoid insecticides and Apis mellifera , with minimal investigation of other pesticide classes, chronic exposures, or non- mellifera species such as A. cerana and A. dorsata . Most studies assessed individual-level effects and nectar foraging, while colony-level endpoints and pollen foraging remain underexplored. Additionally, small and inconsistent sample sizes reduce the statistical robustness and generalisability of many findings. We identify critical gaps in current pesticide risk assessments and call for standardised experimental methodologies, including harmonised behavioural metrics, consistent dosing protocols, and endpoints that link individual- to colony-level responses. Strengthening colony-level indicators under field-realistic exposures is essential for improving the predictive power of regulatory assessments, guiding targeted mitigation strategies, and promoting more sustainable pesticide use in agroecosystems. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Sciences Europe
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01325-0
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pesticide impacts on honey bee foraging behaviour: a field-relevant scoping review

Holger Bargen, Silvio Knaebe, Richard Odemer, Volker Grimm et al.
Environmental Sciences Europe
Insect and Pesticide Research
article

Pesticide impacts on honey bee foraging behaviour: a field-relevant scoping review

Holger Bargen, Silvio Knaebe, Richard Odemer, Volker Grimm, Jürgen Groeneveld, Ming Wang, Fabrice Requier
article en

Abstract

Abstract Honey bees ( Apis spp.) play a crucial role in agricultural productivity and ecosystem functioning through pollination. However, their foraging behaviour is increasingly affected by pesticide exposure, including insecticides, acaricides, fungicides, and herbicides. Reported effects range from adverse to negligible or even stimulatory, depending on the compound, dose, and experimental design. To support more ecologically realistic risk assessments, we conducted a targeted scoping review of 26 studies examining pesticide impacts on honey bee foraging under semi-field and field-realistic conditions. These studies were evaluated based on pesticide type, exposure route and duration, Apis species, foraging type (nectar vs. pollen), behavioural endpoint, level of observation (individual vs. colony), and proposed mechanisms. Our synthesis reveals a pronounced research bias toward neonicotinoid insecticides and Apis mellifera , with minimal investigation of other pesticide classes, chronic exposures, or non- mellifera species such as A. cerana and A. dorsata . Most studies assessed individual-level effects and nectar foraging, while colony-level endpoints and pollen foraging remain underexplored. Additionally, small and inconsistent sample sizes reduce the statistical robustness and generalisability of many findings. We identify critical gaps in current pesticide risk assessments and call for standardised experimental methodologies, including harmonised behavioural metrics, consistent dosing protocols, and endpoints that link individual- to colony-level responses. Strengthening colony-level indicators under field-realistic exposures is essential for improving the predictive power of regulatory assessments, guiding targeted mitigation strategies, and promoting more sustainable pesticide use in agroecosystems. Graphical Abstract

Environmental Sciences EuropeVol. 38(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Julius Kühn-Institut (DE), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Potsdam (DE), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Évolution, Génomes, Comportement, Écologie (FR), RLP AgroScience (Germany) (DE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Insect and Pesticide Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.