Higher risk, lower reimbursement: medicare payment paradox in cranial neurosurgery

Background and purpose To quantify variations in Medicare reimbursement for cranial neurosurgical procedures from 2014 to 2022 and evaluate associations with sociodemographic, clinical, and geographic factors. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional regression analysis of state-level Medicare data reviewed cranial surgery-related DRGs (21–30, 61–63, 81–83, 113–115, 131–133). We used multivariable linear regressions with heteroscedasticity-robust standard errors to assess associations between standardized per capita Medicare payments and variables including age, gender, race/ethnicity, dual-eligibility status, risk category, procedure volume, and region. Results were reported using unstandardized and standardized coefficients across 459 state-year observations. ResultsMean cranial DRG payment was $25,234. The Northeast and West had significantly higher payments than the South (β = $3,952 and $3,781, respectively; P <.001). Each SD increase in the percentage of Black and other non-White beneficiaries was associated with $957 and $875 higher payments, respectively (P <.001). Dual-eligibility rates predicted higher payments (β = $1,300 per SD; P <.001). In contrast, high-risk status was associated with lower payments (β = –$1,616 vs. low-risk; P =.001). Payments demonstrated a consistent upward trend of $905 annually (P <.001), with older populations showing higher payments (β=$728 per SD, p =.002). Conclusions Medicare payments for cranial neurosurgery varied by region, race, socioeconomic status, and risk. High-risk patients received notably lower reimbursement, raising concerns about potential disincentives for treating complex cases. These findings highlight opportunities to improve risk adjustment and promote equitable neurosurgical reimbursement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgical Review
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-04025-8
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Higher risk, lower reimbursement: medicare payment paradox in cranial neurosurgery

Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Timothy G. White, Ethan D. L. Brown, Daniel Rolph Schneider et al.
Neurosurgical Review
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Higher risk, lower reimbursement: medicare payment paradox in cranial neurosurgery

Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Timothy G. White, Ethan D. L. Brown, Daniel Rolph Schneider, Daniel M. Sciubba, Daniel G. Eichberg, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, Jung Hwan Park
article en

Abstract

Background and purpose To quantify variations in Medicare reimbursement for cranial neurosurgical procedures from 2014 to 2022 and evaluate associations with sociodemographic, clinical, and geographic factors. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional regression analysis of state-level Medicare data reviewed cranial surgery-related DRGs (21–30, 61–63, 81–83, 113–115, 131–133). We used multivariable linear regressions with heteroscedasticity-robust standard errors to assess associations between standardized per capita Medicare payments and variables including age, gender, race/ethnicity, dual-eligibility status, risk category, procedure volume, and region. Results were reported using unstandardized and standardized coefficients across 459 state-year observations. ResultsMean cranial DRG payment was $25,234. The Northeast and West had significantly higher payments than the South (β = $3,952 and $3,781, respectively; P <.001). Each SD increase in the percentage of Black and other non-White beneficiaries was associated with $957 and $875 higher payments, respectively (P <.001). Dual-eligibility rates predicted higher payments (β = $1,300 per SD; P <.001). In contrast, high-risk status was associated with lower payments (β = –$1,616 vs. low-risk; P =.001). Payments demonstrated a consistent upward trend of $905 annually (P <.001), with older populations showing higher payments (β=$728 per SD, p =.002). Conclusions Medicare payments for cranial neurosurgery varied by region, race, socioeconomic status, and risk. High-risk patients received notably lower reimbursement, raising concerns about potential disincentives for treating complex cases. These findings highlight opportunities to improve risk adjustment and promote equitable neurosurgical reimbursement.

Neurosurgical ReviewVol. 49(1)
Hofstra University (US), North Shore University Hospital (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), North Shore Diabetes and Endocrine Associates (US), Neurological Surgery (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.