Bridging green economic efficiency gaps between G7 and E7 economies: The role of technological innovation and resource rents

Amid intensifying energy challenges and ecological constraints, promoting green economic transformation has become vital for achieving sustainable growth and reducing reliance on resource-intensive development models. This study explores the heterogeneity of green economic efficiency (GEE) between the Group of Seven (G7) and Emerging Seven (E7) economies using a three-stage super-efficiency SBM-DEA that integrates non-radial measurement, effective unit ranking, and stochastic noise correction. A Tobit regression model is further employed to assess the nonlinear effects of the technological innovation and natural resource rents on GEE. The results indicate that: (1) G7 economies consistently outperform E7 economies in GEE, although the efficiency gap has gradually narrowed since 2016. Within E7 economies, marked efficiency disparities persist, reflecting limited technological diffusion and weaker innovation capacity. (2) G7 economies exhibit synergistic improvements across management, technological, and scale efficiencies, whereas E7 economies display higher volatility and structural constraints. (3) Technological innovation exhibits a pronounced U-shaped effect on green economic efficiency (GEE), whereas natural resource rents display an inverted U-shaped relationship with GEE. These effects are more pronounced and rapidly transmitted in G7 economies, while in E7 economies they are weaker and the turning points are delayed. Further analysis indicates that industrial structure significantly constrains the impact of innovation, whereas government effectiveness does not constitute a stable moderating mechanism in either group of economies. These findings highlight the need for differentiated policy strategies to promote green economic efficiency through innovation-driven growth, efficient resource use, and institutional reform. • Measured G7 and E7 green efficiency using a three stage SBM-DEA model. • Filtered environmental and random effects through stochastic frontier analysis. • Identified U shaped GII and inverted-U NRR effects on green efficiency. • Technological innovation and resource rents led to disparity between G7 and E7. • Industrial structure will restrain the driving effect of innovation on GEE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108366
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging green economic efficiency gaps between G7 and E7 economies: The role of technological innovation and resource rents

Xueting Jiang, Shuyu Li
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Bridging green economic efficiency gaps between G7 and E7 economies: The role of technological innovation and resource rents

Xueting Jiang, Shuyu Li
article en

Abstract

Amid intensifying energy challenges and ecological constraints, promoting green economic transformation has become vital for achieving sustainable growth and reducing reliance on resource-intensive development models. This study explores the heterogeneity of green economic efficiency (GEE) between the Group of Seven (G7) and Emerging Seven (E7) economies using a three-stage super-efficiency SBM-DEA that integrates non-radial measurement, effective unit ranking, and stochastic noise correction. A Tobit regression model is further employed to assess the nonlinear effects of the technological innovation and natural resource rents on GEE. The results indicate that: (1) G7 economies consistently outperform E7 economies in GEE, although the efficiency gap has gradually narrowed since 2016. Within E7 economies, marked efficiency disparities persist, reflecting limited technological diffusion and weaker innovation capacity. (2) G7 economies exhibit synergistic improvements across management, technological, and scale efficiencies, whereas E7 economies display higher volatility and structural constraints. (3) Technological innovation exhibits a pronounced U-shaped effect on green economic efficiency (GEE), whereas natural resource rents display an inverted U-shaped relationship with GEE. These effects are more pronounced and rapidly transmitted in G7 economies, while in E7 economies they are weaker and the turning points are delayed. Further analysis indicates that industrial structure significantly constrains the impact of innovation, whereas government effectiveness does not constitute a stable moderating mechanism in either group of economies. These findings highlight the need for differentiated policy strategies to promote green economic efficiency through innovation-driven growth, efficient resource use, and institutional reform. • Measured G7 and E7 green efficiency using a three stage SBM-DEA model. • Filtered environmental and random effects through stochastic frontier analysis. • Identified U shaped GII and inverted-U NRR effects on green efficiency. • Technological innovation and resource rents led to disparity between G7 and E7. • Industrial structure will restrain the driving effect of innovation on GEE.

Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewVol. 119
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.