Quantifying erasure and interference from adjacent tracks in heat-assisted magnetic recording

With track spacing in heat-assisted magnetic recording approaching the width of the reader and the thermal spot, the areal density capability is significantly penalized by interference and erasure from adjacent tracks. To quantify the impact, spin stand tests have been developed based on synchronous writing to capture the noise-free waveforms of the adjacent tracks and the partially erased data track, respectively. The results show that side reading interference from foreground adjacent tracks varies from 13 to 18 dB and strongly correlates with the effective reader width. Adjacent track erasure dominates at the edge of the data track, reduces its signal and increase its spatial noise. The signal loss and spatial noise increase scale with logarithm of the number of adjacent track writes. Measurements from two medium designs show such significant difference in adjacent track erasure that the ranking of their areal density capability is impacted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIP Advances
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/9.0000959
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Magnetic properties of thin films
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying erasure and interference from adjacent tracks in heat-assisted magnetic recording

Jay Loven, J. Gadbois, Xuan Zheng, W.R. Eppler
1 citations
AIP Advances
Magnetic properties of thin films
31.39
article

Quantifying erasure and interference from adjacent tracks in heat-assisted magnetic recording

Jay Loven, J. Gadbois, Xuan Zheng, W.R. Eppler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With track spacing in heat-assisted magnetic recording approaching the width of the reader and the thermal spot, the areal density capability is significantly penalized by interference and erasure from adjacent tracks. To quantify the impact, spin stand tests have been developed based on synchronous writing to capture the noise-free waveforms of the adjacent tracks and the partially erased data track, respectively. The results show that side reading interference from foreground adjacent tracks varies from 13 to 18 dB and strongly correlates with the effective reader width. Adjacent track erasure dominates at the edge of the data track, reduces its signal and increase its spatial noise. The signal loss and spatial noise increase scale with logarithm of the number of adjacent track writes. Measurements from two medium designs show such significant difference in adjacent track erasure that the ranking of their areal density capability is impacted.

AIP AdvancesVol. 16(2)
Seagate (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Magnetic properties of thin films
31.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.