Bacterial Expression of Gene‐Encoding DNA Origami Structures

Previous studies have shown that DNA origamis assembled from gene‐encoding scaffolds can be taken up by mammalian cells and ultimately lead to the expression of the encoded genes. While interactions of DNA origami structures with mammalian cells have been extensively investigated, their interactions with bacteria remain poorly understood. Here, we systematically study how structure, folding state, chemical functionalization, and polycationic coatings influence the uptake and expression of gene‐encoding DNA origami structures in E. coli . Using complementary positive‐ and negative selection assays, we show that DNA origami structures display markedly lower transformation efficiencies than their corresponding circular single‐stranded scaffolds. Folding geometry, compactness, and scaffold accessibility strongly modulate transformation, with partially folded origami structures showing considerably higher activity. Chemical functionalization did not improve uptake, whereas polyplex formation can improve stability and transformation. Fluorescence and electron microscopy reveal that DNA origami structures predominantly associate with the bacterial surface. Leveraging the intrinsically low transformability of intact DNA origamis, we engineered photocleavable nanostructures that enable UV‐triggered release of gene‐encoding scaffolds, providing switchable activation of transformation. Our results offer fundamental insights into the bacterial processing of DNA nanostructures and establish a framework for controlling DNA entry and expression using programmable nanoscale carriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Structures
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202500864
Primary Topic
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bacterial Expression of Gene‐Encoding DNA Origami Structures

Trishant R. Umrekar, Ivan Barišić, Morgan Beeby, Friedrich C. Simmel et al.
Small Structures
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
article

Bacterial Expression of Gene‐Encoding DNA Origami Structures

Trishant R. Umrekar, Ivan Barišić, Morgan Beeby, Friedrich C. Simmel, Verena Dobretzberger, Alexander Hebel, Maria Ponetsmüller, Florian Ohner
article en

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that DNA origamis assembled from gene‐encoding scaffolds can be taken up by mammalian cells and ultimately lead to the expression of the encoded genes. While interactions of DNA origami structures with mammalian cells have been extensively investigated, their interactions with bacteria remain poorly understood. Here, we systematically study how structure, folding state, chemical functionalization, and polycationic coatings influence the uptake and expression of gene‐encoding DNA origami structures in E. coli . Using complementary positive‐ and negative selection assays, we show that DNA origami structures display markedly lower transformation efficiencies than their corresponding circular single‐stranded scaffolds. Folding geometry, compactness, and scaffold accessibility strongly modulate transformation, with partially folded origami structures showing considerably higher activity. Chemical functionalization did not improve uptake, whereas polyplex formation can improve stability and transformation. Fluorescence and electron microscopy reveal that DNA origami structures predominantly associate with the bacterial surface. Leveraging the intrinsically low transformability of intact DNA origamis, we engineered photocleavable nanostructures that enable UV‐triggered release of gene‐encoding scaffolds, providing switchable activation of transformation. Our results offer fundamental insights into the bacterial processing of DNA nanostructures and establish a framework for controlling DNA entry and expression using programmable nanoscale carriers.

Small StructuresVol. 7(2)
University of Vienna (AT), AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT), Bundesministerium für Familien und Jugend (AT), Imperial College London (GB), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.