Prevalence and Characteristics of CMV Reactivation after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell Therapy: A Referral Center Experience

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has transformed the treatment landscape of various malignancies. However, immune suppression associated with CAR T therapy has incurred increased risk of infections, including cytomegalovirus reactivation (CMVr). Current guidelines do not mandate routine CMV monitoring post-CAR T therapy, but our clinical observations suggest a different approach may be warranted. Between November 2018 and January 2025, 237 patients received a total of 361 commercial and investigational CAR T-cell products at the University of Iowa Health Care (UIHC). Of these, 225 patients had baseline CMV IgG serology, with 145 testing IgG seropositive. Most patients were male (52.4%) with a median age of 67 years. Indications for CAR T therapy included: relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=66), multiple myeloma (n=54), mantle cell lymphoma (n=9), B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=7), follicular lymphoma (n=5), and other diagnoses (n=4). During the study period, UIHC utilized two different quantitative plasma CMV nucleic acid amplification tests. The DiaSorin CMV assay (Liaison MDX platform; limit of quantification [LOQ], 200 IU/mL) was used until October 2024, after which it was replaced by the Roche Cobas CMV assay (Roche 5800 platform; LOQ, 35 IU/mL). Among seropositive patients, 44 (30%) developed CMVr, with cumulative incidence reaching 39% at 6 months and 47% at 12 months post-CAR T infusion. Antiviral treatment was required in 28 patients, most commonly with valganciclovir, ganciclovir, or foscarnet (N=17, 6, 5, respectively). Five patients developed end-organ CMV disease in the retina, liver, esophagus, and colon. All were biopsy-proven except retinitis, which was diagnosed on fundoscopic exam. Most patients treated for CMVr (22/28) cleared the virus within a median of 33 days. Nine patients died from progression of their primary malignancy before CMV clearance. At a median follow-up of 9.2 months, 12- and 60-month overall survival (OS) was 72% and 32%, respectively. Most deaths (78%) were due to disease relapse; none were directly attributed to CMVr. On univariate analysis, age, sex, number of prior lines of therapy, history of autologous stem cell transplant, and CAR T target antigen were not significantly associated with time to CMVr or OS. The pathophysiology of CMVr in CAR T recipients remains incompletely understood. Immune dysregulation, inflammatory cytokines, and T-cell dysfunction—exacerbated by steroids or anti-cytokine agents like tocilizumab or anakinra—may contribute. A study of HSCT patients suggests that CMV-specific T-cell depletion is associated with CMVr, but this has not been validated in the post-CAR T setting. While emerging therapies such as virus-specific CTLs show promise, further research is needed to define optimal CMV monitoring protocols and evaluate prophylactic antiviral strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2025.12.818
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence and Characteristics of CMV Reactivation after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell Therapy: A Referral Center Experience

Mehndi Dandwani, Kittika Poonsombudlert, Jonathan Lochner, Vijaya Lakshmi Kankanala et al.
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Prevalence and Characteristics of CMV Reactivation after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell Therapy: A Referral Center Experience

Mehndi Dandwani, Kittika Poonsombudlert, Jonathan Lochner, Vijaya Lakshmi Kankanala, Dilek Ince, Bradley Ford, Sarah Mott
article en

Abstract

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has transformed the treatment landscape of various malignancies. However, immune suppression associated with CAR T therapy has incurred increased risk of infections, including cytomegalovirus reactivation (CMVr). Current guidelines do not mandate routine CMV monitoring post-CAR T therapy, but our clinical observations suggest a different approach may be warranted. Between November 2018 and January 2025, 237 patients received a total of 361 commercial and investigational CAR T-cell products at the University of Iowa Health Care (UIHC). Of these, 225 patients had baseline CMV IgG serology, with 145 testing IgG seropositive. Most patients were male (52.4%) with a median age of 67 years. Indications for CAR T therapy included: relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=66), multiple myeloma (n=54), mantle cell lymphoma (n=9), B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=7), follicular lymphoma (n=5), and other diagnoses (n=4). During the study period, UIHC utilized two different quantitative plasma CMV nucleic acid amplification tests. The DiaSorin CMV assay (Liaison MDX platform; limit of quantification [LOQ], 200 IU/mL) was used until October 2024, after which it was replaced by the Roche Cobas CMV assay (Roche 5800 platform; LOQ, 35 IU/mL). Among seropositive patients, 44 (30%) developed CMVr, with cumulative incidence reaching 39% at 6 months and 47% at 12 months post-CAR T infusion. Antiviral treatment was required in 28 patients, most commonly with valganciclovir, ganciclovir, or foscarnet (N=17, 6, 5, respectively). Five patients developed end-organ CMV disease in the retina, liver, esophagus, and colon. All were biopsy-proven except retinitis, which was diagnosed on fundoscopic exam. Most patients treated for CMVr (22/28) cleared the virus within a median of 33 days. Nine patients died from progression of their primary malignancy before CMV clearance. At a median follow-up of 9.2 months, 12- and 60-month overall survival (OS) was 72% and 32%, respectively. Most deaths (78%) were due to disease relapse; none were directly attributed to CMVr. On univariate analysis, age, sex, number of prior lines of therapy, history of autologous stem cell transplant, and CAR T target antigen were not significantly associated with time to CMVr or OS. The pathophysiology of CMVr in CAR T recipients remains incompletely understood. Immune dysregulation, inflammatory cytokines, and T-cell dysfunction—exacerbated by steroids or anti-cytokine agents like tocilizumab or anakinra—may contribute. A study of HSCT patients suggests that CMV-specific T-cell depletion is associated with CMVr, but this has not been validated in the post-CAR T setting. While emerging therapies such as virus-specific CTLs show promise, further research is needed to define optimal CMV monitoring protocols and evaluate prophylactic antiviral strategies.

Transplantation and Cellular TherapyVol. 32(2)
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.