The prognostic value of preoperative Naples prognostic score for overall survival and progression-free survival in colorectal cancer

This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of the Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and sarcopenia in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to plot survival curves for PFS and OS, and the Log-rank test was applied to compare survival differences between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive efficacy of NPS for PFS and OS in CRC patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify independent risk factors affecting PFS, OS, and sarcopenia. Nomograms were developed based on PFS and OS to forecast the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year prognosis of CRC patients, while the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves were used to assess the predictive performance of these nomograms. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients in the high-NPS (scores 3–4) group were significantly associated with poor prognosis (PFS: 48.9% vs. 66.0%, p < 0.001; OS: 48.9% vs. 66.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed that the high-NPS group was an independent risk factor for PFS (HR = 1.485, 95% CI: 1.241–1.777, p < 0.001), OS (HR = 1.452, 95% CI: 1.219–1.729, p < 0.001), and sarcopenia (HR = 1.876, 95% CI: 1.403–2.507, p < 0.001). For the nomograms developed based on the independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS, the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year outcomes were 0.807, 0.776, and 0.766 for PFS, and 0.772, 0.775, and 0.769 for OS, respectively. The C-indices of the nomograms were 0.795 for PFS and 0.815 for OS. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predicted and actual values. Decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed that the nomograms provided a better clinical net benefit than tumor staging alone. The preoperative NPS is a promising prognostic scoring method for predicting poor outcomes in CRC patients. The prognostic nomogram based on NPS can serve as an effective tool for the comprehensive prognostic evaluation of CRC patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15679-y
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The prognostic value of preoperative Naples prognostic score for overall survival and progression-free survival in colorectal cancer

Taiqi Chen, Hailun Xie, Shuangyi Tang, Bin Lan et al.
BMC Cancer
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

The prognostic value of preoperative Naples prognostic score for overall survival and progression-free survival in colorectal cancer

Taiqi Chen, Hailun Xie, Shuangyi Tang, Bin Lan, Qi Zhou, Jialiang Gan
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of the Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and sarcopenia in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to plot survival curves for PFS and OS, and the Log-rank test was applied to compare survival differences between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive efficacy of NPS for PFS and OS in CRC patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify independent risk factors affecting PFS, OS, and sarcopenia. Nomograms were developed based on PFS and OS to forecast the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year prognosis of CRC patients, while the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves were used to assess the predictive performance of these nomograms. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients in the high-NPS (scores 3–4) group were significantly associated with poor prognosis (PFS: 48.9% vs. 66.0%, p < 0.001; OS: 48.9% vs. 66.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed that the high-NPS group was an independent risk factor for PFS (HR = 1.485, 95% CI: 1.241–1.777, p < 0.001), OS (HR = 1.452, 95% CI: 1.219–1.729, p < 0.001), and sarcopenia (HR = 1.876, 95% CI: 1.403–2.507, p < 0.001). For the nomograms developed based on the independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS, the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year outcomes were 0.807, 0.776, and 0.766 for PFS, and 0.772, 0.775, and 0.769 for OS, respectively. The C-indices of the nomograms were 0.795 for PFS and 0.815 for OS. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predicted and actual values. Decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed that the nomograms provided a better clinical net benefit than tumor staging alone. The preoperative NPS is a promising prognostic scoring method for predicting poor outcomes in CRC patients. The prognostic nomogram based on NPS can serve as an effective tool for the comprehensive prognostic evaluation of CRC patients.

BMC CancerVol. 26(1)
Guangxi University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.