Not one crisis, but many. The “crisis cube” and the politics of governing crises

Abstract This article examines the relationship between different types of crises and the political strategies employed to govern them. Drawing on crisis management literature, it introduces a novel heuristic typology—the “crisis cube”—grounded in three analytical dimensions: time, space, and intentionality. Although often treated as objective characteristics, these dimensions are politically constructed and strategically interpreted by crisis leaders. Through a structured analysis of empirical cases drawn from the literature, the article explores how varying framings of similar crisis scenarios can produce distinct modes of politically governing crises. It attempts to highlight that the interaction between the intrinsic features of a crisis and their political interpretation significantly shapes crisis governance trajectories. In doing so, the article contributes to bridging the gap between analytical classifications of crises and the politics of crisis response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy and Society
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puaf037
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not one crisis, but many. The “crisis cube” and the politics of governing crises

Stefania Profeti, Federico Toth
Policy and Society
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Not one crisis, but many. The “crisis cube” and the politics of governing crises

Stefania Profeti, Federico Toth
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the relationship between different types of crises and the political strategies employed to govern them. Drawing on crisis management literature, it introduces a novel heuristic typology—the “crisis cube”—grounded in three analytical dimensions: time, space, and intentionality. Although often treated as objective characteristics, these dimensions are politically constructed and strategically interpreted by crisis leaders. Through a structured analysis of empirical cases drawn from the literature, the article explores how varying framings of similar crisis scenarios can produce distinct modes of politically governing crises. It attempts to highlight that the interaction between the intrinsic features of a crisis and their political interpretation significantly shapes crisis governance trajectories. In doing so, the article contributes to bridging the gap between analytical classifications of crises and the politics of crisis response.

Policy and SocietyVol. 45(1)
University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.