Evaluation of Developmental Charity Programs in the Kingdom of Bahrain: A Statistical Perspective

Abstract This study evaluates the developmental charitable programs in the Kingdom of Bahrain, focusing on four key dimensions: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, and social impact. Utilizing a quantitative approach, data were collected from a stratified random sample of 240 beneficiaries through a structured questionnaire. Statistical Perspectiveincluded descriptive statistics, correlation, multiple regression, and ANOVA. Results revealed high evaluation scores across all dimensions, with relevance as the strongest predictor of social impact, explaining 58% of its variance, effectiveness, and efficiency. Significant positive correlations among all constructs underline their interconnected roles in program success. Furthermore, demographic differences in social impact perception suggest that tailored interventions are needed. The findings underscore the importance of aligning programs closely with beneficiary needs, optimizing resource use, and employing advanced evaluation techniques. The study offers actionable recommendations for enhancing program design, monitoring, and stakeholder engagement to maximize sustainable social outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18466848
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Developmental Charity Programs in the Kingdom of Bahrain: A Statistical Perspective

Abdul Sattar Alazzawi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Community Health and Development
article

Evaluation of Developmental Charity Programs in the Kingdom of Bahrain: A Statistical Perspective

Abdul Sattar Alazzawi
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the developmental charitable programs in the Kingdom of Bahrain, focusing on four key dimensions: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, and social impact. Utilizing a quantitative approach, data were collected from a stratified random sample of 240 beneficiaries through a structured questionnaire. Statistical Perspectiveincluded descriptive statistics, correlation, multiple regression, and ANOVA. Results revealed high evaluation scores across all dimensions, with relevance as the strongest predictor of social impact, explaining 58% of its variance, effectiveness, and efficiency. Significant positive correlations among all constructs underline their interconnected roles in program success. Furthermore, demographic differences in social impact perception suggest that tailored interventions are needed. The findings underscore the importance of aligning programs closely with beneficiary needs, optimizing resource use, and employing advanced evaluation techniques. The study offers actionable recommendations for enhancing program design, monitoring, and stakeholder engagement to maximize sustainable social outcomes.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Bahrain (BH), University College of Bahrain (BH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Developmental Charity Programs in the Kingdom of Bahrain: A Statistical Perspective — Abdul Sattar Alazzawi · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS