Aggregated Cognitive Assessments and the Limits of Discriminative Evaluation

This technical note examines the limitations of aggregated cognitive assessments commonly used to summarize performance across tasks or domains. By isolating a minimal condition under which aggregation collapses distinct cognitive profiles into identical scores, it shows how discriminative information may be lost despite locally informative evaluations. The analysis is purely diagnostic and non-theoretical, focusing on inferential limits imposed by evaluation interfaces rather than on cognitive models or psychological interpretations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18470748
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aggregated Cognitive Assessments and the Limits of Discriminative Evaluation

Danilo Tavella
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Aggregated Cognitive Assessments and the Limits of Discriminative Evaluation

Danilo Tavella
article en

Abstract

This technical note examines the limitations of aggregated cognitive assessments commonly used to summarize performance across tasks or domains. By isolating a minimal condition under which aggregation collapses distinct cognitive profiles into identical scores, it shows how discriminative information may be lost despite locally informative evaluations. The analysis is purely diagnostic and non-theoretical, focusing on inferential limits imposed by evaluation interfaces rather than on cognitive models or psychological interpretations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.