Pupillary and attention dynamics in response to road hazard detection

• We examined hazard perception in naturalistic driving videos using eye tracking. • Pupil dilation increased ∼ 1s before hazard detection and peaked ∼ 2s after. • Pupil dilation was larger for True-Positive than for False-Positive responses. • Fixation duration increased ∼ 2s before hazard detection, especially for True-Positives. • Attention remained predominantly focal, with no significant ambient-focal shifts. Hazard perception is the ability to anticipate and respond to potentially dangerous traffic situations, which is an important aspect of driving competence. This paper analyses pupil size fluctuations, changes in fixation duration, and the dynamics of ambient/focal attention in a laboratory hazard-perception task to measure underlying attentional and cognitive mechanisms that occur when drivers detect hazards. In the task, licensed drivers (n = 42) watched videos of natural driving scenarios recorded through a dashboard camera while their eye movements were recorded. They were asked to subjectively detect hazards (via a key press), which were later classified as either True- or False-Positive responses. We analyzed the time before and after the decision about the presence of a traffic hazard. As predicted, the pupil size increased over time. The pupil response was stronger for True than False hazard responses. The significant difference in pupil size between True and False responses appeared shortly before the decision and persisted for at least three seconds after it. There was no statistically significant differences in fixation duration over time, but True-Positive responses were related with higher fixation duration compared to False positive decisions. The increase in fixation duration was greater for True-Positive compared to False-Positive decisions. The analysis of ambient and focal attention dynamics revealed that participants maintained focal attention before and after hazard detection. The results show the potential for monitoring oculometrics in assistive driver systems for the detection of distraction and hazard perception in real time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2026.103543
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pupillary and attention dynamics in response to road hazard detection

Izabela Krejtz, Andrew T. Duchowski, Krzysztof Krejtz, Filippo Baldisserotto et al.
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Pupillary and attention dynamics in response to road hazard detection

Izabela Krejtz, Andrew T. Duchowski, Krzysztof Krejtz, Filippo Baldisserotto, Estefania Dominguez-Martinez
article en

Abstract

• We examined hazard perception in naturalistic driving videos using eye tracking. • Pupil dilation increased ∼ 1s before hazard detection and peaked ∼ 2s after. • Pupil dilation was larger for True-Positive than for False-Positive responses. • Fixation duration increased ∼ 2s before hazard detection, especially for True-Positives. • Attention remained predominantly focal, with no significant ambient-focal shifts. Hazard perception is the ability to anticipate and respond to potentially dangerous traffic situations, which is an important aspect of driving competence. This paper analyses pupil size fluctuations, changes in fixation duration, and the dynamics of ambient/focal attention in a laboratory hazard-perception task to measure underlying attentional and cognitive mechanisms that occur when drivers detect hazards. In the task, licensed drivers (n = 42) watched videos of natural driving scenarios recorded through a dashboard camera while their eye movements were recorded. They were asked to subjectively detect hazards (via a key press), which were later classified as either True- or False-Positive responses. We analyzed the time before and after the decision about the presence of a traffic hazard. As predicted, the pupil size increased over time. The pupil response was stronger for True than False hazard responses. The significant difference in pupil size between True and False responses appeared shortly before the decision and persisted for at least three seconds after it. There was no statistically significant differences in fixation duration over time, but True-Positive responses were related with higher fixation duration compared to False positive decisions. The increase in fixation duration was greater for True-Positive compared to False-Positive decisions. The analysis of ambient and focal attention dynamics revealed that participants maintained focal attention before and after hazard detection. The results show the potential for monitoring oculometrics in assistive driver systems for the detection of distraction and hazard perception in real time.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 118
Danderyds sjukhus (SE), Uniwersytet SWPS (PL), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.